Free Energy Diagrams: Understand Endo/Exothermic Reactions

AI Thread Summary
Free energy diagrams illustrate the relationship between reactants and products in chemical reactions, indicating whether they are endothermic or exothermic. The determination of a reaction's nature is based on the relative energy levels of products and reactants, rather than solely on the free energy change (Delta G). While a negative Delta G typically indicates an exothermic reaction, the activation energy required for the reaction does not influence this classification. The discussion highlights the complexity of interpreting free energy in relation to entropy and temperature, emphasizing that the diagram's validity depends on specific initial conditions. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately analyzing chemical reactions.
lollol
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
It's thermo.. so I just posted it in the physics forums

but.. a free energy diagram is supposed to represent G right?

We normally conclude whether a rxn is endo/exothermic depending on whether the product is at a "lower" or higher energy than the reactants just by looking at the diagram

energydiagram.gif


But how can we do that? especially if Delta G = Delta H - (T * Delta S)
Free energy depends on Entropy and Temperature as well

A "negative" change in free energy surely does not necessarily mean an exothermic reaction... but somehow, we are able to conclude whether something is exo/endo simply by looking at a free energy diagram.. how?
 

Attachments

  • energydiagram.gif
    energydiagram.gif
    1.8 KB · Views: 509
Physics news on Phys.org
The diagram you have there doesn't have any numbers on it, but if it did it would be valid for only one set of initial conditions.

I'm not sure I understand your last sentence. A negative delta G is exothermic because it means energy is released. The initial hump there doesn't have anything to do with if the final result is exothermic or endothermic - it is just the required activation energy (in this case, it looks like the energy required to disassociate the constituents of the compound).
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top