- #26

- 36,206

- 6,823

Why through CM? What force has a torque about that?One which passes through both CM and point of contact. ..

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Jnan
- Start date

- #26

- 36,206

- 6,823

Why through CM? What force has a torque about that?One which passes through both CM and point of contact. ..

- #27

- 15

- 0

No force would produce torque about that. I think any axis passing through the point of contact should work fine.Why through CM? What force has a torque about that?

- #28

- 36,206

- 6,823

Yes, but it does not even need to pass through the point of contact. You just need that at no time does friction torque have a torque about it.No force would produce torque about that. I think any axis passing through the point of contact should work fine.

Also, to be useful, the rotating ball does need to have angular momentum about it.

- #29

- 15

- 0

Okay now I understand it quite well. Let us now initiate a discussion about the linear momentum.

- #30

- 36,206

- 6,823

There are two ways to solve this problem.Okay now I understand it quite well. Let us now initiate a discussion about the linear momentum.

1. Let the frictional force be F, write one equation for linear momentum and one for angular momentum about the centre of the ball.

2. Choose the axis for angular momentum such that friction has no torque about it. Angular momentum about that axis is conserved, so you only need one equation. You do not to consider linear momentum.

Share: