Freezing time for 1 cm of water

AI Thread Summary
To build a backyard skating rink efficiently in South Jersey's fluctuating winter temperatures, the user seeks to freeze water in layers of 1 mm or 1 cm at a time. Key questions include the freezing time for 1 cm of water, the impact of surface area on freezing time, and how lower temperatures affect this process. The user is primarily focused on the freezing duration rather than concerns about melting ice during warmer spells. Understanding these factors is crucial for optimizing the rink construction process. The discussion highlights the complexities involved in achieving a solid ice layer quickly in variable winter conditions.
openbahr
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I have a question... first some backround. I am asking this question is so I can build a backyard skating rink in the fastest way possible. I live in south Jersey so winter is allot of freeze/thaw.

The common way for a backyard rink is 1) place a liner 2) fill 2-3 inches 3) let freeze.
This way, however, is tough in my climate because I would need many days of sub freezing temps to get a good slab of ice.

So...I want to build it up 1 mm or cm at a time, while the temp is right, instantly adding the next layer as soon as the previous one freezes thereby saving time.

Questions:
1) is there a set formula to figure how fast 1 cm will freeze?
2) does surface area matter ? (Im sure it does)
3) how does the time to freeze change as temp drops lower

Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are way too many unknowns to solve the problem as given.

How are you going to make sure your ice doesn't melt when the temps go high?
 
I wasn't too concerned about the melting. I am just interested right now how long a cm would take. Sent from my iPhone using Physics Forums
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top