Freezing water in an unexpandable container?

AI Thread Summary
If a strong, unexpandable container is filled completely with water and subjected to freezing, the water would freeze under immense pressure, maintaining its volume. This pressure could lead to the formation of different types of ice, as there are multiple phases of ice that depend on temperature and pressure conditions. The freezing point of water would likely decrease under such conditions, although the exact amount is uncertain. The discussion highlights the complex nature of water's phase diagram and the various forms ice can take under different pressures. Overall, the scenario poses intriguing questions about the physical properties of water and ice.
leakeg
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
If you did had a container that was strong enough to resist the expansive forces generated as the water in it freezes, what would happen? (assuming the container is filled completely with water)

Thanks for any answers in advance, and I hope this post is in the correct place, if not, then sorry!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums leakeg!

If the container really is strong enough, the frozen water would be under a tremendous amount of pressure in order to maintain its original volume.
 
thanks for your reply!

so you're saying the water would freeze? so we would have a compressed solid? or would the ice be a different form of ice? would it freeze at a colder temperature?

is this even possible in the real world?

wow that was a lot of questions haha.
 
There is something like 7 different types of water ice (the phase diagram of water ice is VERY complicated), which form it freezes into would depend on the temperature and pressure.
 
alright, cheers!

how much do you guys think it would lower the freezing point by?
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top