Frequency reponse of shock absorber piston in F1 car

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the frequency response of a piston in a shock absorber of a Formula 1 car, specifically focusing on the maximum frequency at which the piston moves during operation. Participants explore the implications of oscillation, damping characteristics, and the factors influencing the piston movement in relation to the car's performance on different surfaces.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • John Criticos inquires about the maximum frequency of a shock absorber piston, suggesting a guess of about 50Hz based on his research.
  • One participant argues that a shock absorber is designed to prevent oscillation and that any oscillation indicates a defect in the suspension system.
  • Another participant counters that while the car is in motion, the piston will indeed oscillate, and the quality of the shock absorber affects the degree of this oscillation.
  • A different participant clarifies that oscillation implies continued movement without additional energy input, stating that an ideal shock absorber should dampen any movement by the time the suspension returns to its neutral position.
  • One participant mentions that typical street cars are underdamped, with damping ratios around 0.2-0.4, and questions the original inquiry's clarity regarding the context of the car's movement and surface conditions.
  • There is a suggestion that the answer to the frequency question may depend on factors such as the car's actions and the surface being driven over, including considerations of resonant frequencies and damping.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the nature of oscillation in shock absorbers, with some asserting that oscillation is a sign of defectiveness while others argue that oscillation is inherent during motion. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the answer to the frequency question is highly dependent on various factors, including the design of the suspension system, the conditions under which the car is operating, and the specific characteristics of the shock absorber.

LM741
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!

This might be bit of the 'electrical engineering' topic - but maybe someone out there can help :)

Does anybody have any idea of what the maximum frequency of a piston in a shock absorber of a forumula 1 car is?
What do i mean: How many times does the piston (in a shock absorber) move up and down, past the reference point, in one second. The reference point is defined as the point where the piston sits when the car is stationery. I ave googled this tones of times wih no luck - I've emailed "f1 experts" but without any reply - if anyone knows of some expert ( or someone that would know such info.) could perhaps ask..please! oh yes - all i need is the maximum freuency - which would probably occur during full speed.

Please if anyone can give me some idea. I would guess about 50Hz.

Thanks guys
John Criticos
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
A shock adsorber is designed to prevent any oscillation.
Many designs are non linear was well as being non symmetrical.

The idea, if the suspension is properly designed is to fully disapate all the stored energy of the spring by the time the suspension returns to the normal curb height position.
If it oscilates at all it's defective or not proper for the rest of the suspension.

I suspect what you want is the one shot travel time from some compressed position back to the neutral position.
If you know the spring constant and unsprung weight you can probably get a ball park figure.
Non linear damping will lower the time though.
The shortest time allowed is how fast the spring can move the wheel back to the neutral position with no damping.

Also if you are moving the car back up as opposed to pushing the wheel back down the mass will be different.

Chances are that someone who might know would consider their suspension tuning a deep dark secret.

Best I can do.
 
"If it oscilates at all it's defective or not proper for the rest of the suspension."
NoTime>> i couldn't disagree with you more. Whilst the car is in motion - the piston is going to move up and down! Hence the oscillations. It will oscillate! The quality of the shock absorber just determines the degree to which the piston will oscillate. But the statement pf yours, quoted above, is totally incorrect - at least i think so.
Thanks, anyway.
 
Oscillation implies continued movement without additional energy input.
An ideal shock adsober will fully damp any movement of the suspension by the time the suspension returns to the neutral position.

While the car is on a flat road, moving at a stright line at constant speed the suspension (and the shock piston) should not move at all.

The shock is a damper designed to adsorb energy.
Of course the shock piston will move if you hit bumps or potholes, but that's quite different from oscillation.
A car with shocks that allow oscillation is dangerous.
 
As an aside, almost all cars are underdamped. Typical street cars have damping ratios of ~0.2-0.4 (though the dampers are nonlinear, so this isn't completely well-defined). Any more than that gets extremely uncomfortable.

Anyway, I don't understand the original question. The answer depends completely on what the car's doing and the surface it's being driven over. Are you asking about the resonant frequencies of the chassis? The amount of damping? The highest frequencies that are important to control? For the last question, I think that the you'll get your answer by looking at the rumble strips.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K