Frequently Made Errors in Mechanics: Hydrostatics - Comments

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on common errors in understanding hydrostatics, particularly regarding the forces acting on a block just before it moves upward. It highlights the complexity of determining the force at this instant, emphasizing that there is no true "instant" but rather a transient process where forces vary. The conversation also notes that as an upward force is applied, water may rush into the gap beneath the block, creating a transient vacuum or pressure drop. If the rope's slack is taken up slowly, the effects of Bernoulli's principle would remain negligible, allowing tension to increase smoothly. Overall, the nuances of hydrostatic forces and their implications are central to the discussion.
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
42,639
Reaction score
10,428
haruspex submitted a new PF Insights post

Frequently Made Errors in Mechanics - Hydrostatics

hydrostatics.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes wrobel and Greg Bernhardt
Physics news on Phys.org
Qestion 2 is interesting as an example of how one could go into more and more detail into the phenomenon and get different answers for each "level" of detail. This is particularly true here because we ask about the force at the very instant when the block is about to move upward. In practice, there would be no "instant" but there would be a transient process where the force would vary in interesting ways before settling down into ##W-\rhoVg##

If we apply an increasing upward force on the rope, a moment would come when water would try to rush into the gap between the block and the floor. You could think of it as a transient partial vacuum under the block, or as a bernoulli pressure drop that results in a net downward component.

If the slack on the rope is taken up infinitely slowly, then the bernoulli / vacuum effect would always be negligible and the tension would climb smoothly from zero to the archimedes value.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top