Friction: A box at rest on a slope

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating forces acting on a 22kg box on a 45-degree slope, focusing on the largest upward force to keep the box at rest and the smallest perpendicular force needed. The initial calculations for the maximum force were incorrect due to neglecting the gravitational component acting down the slope and miscalculating the normal force. Participants emphasized the importance of using free body diagrams to analyze forces and correctly apply Newton's laws to ensure the net force remains zero. The role of the coefficient of friction was debated, with some unsure of its application in the context of the problem. Ultimately, the consensus is that the applied forces must balance the gravitational force parallel to the slope for the box to remain stationary.
sonoftunk
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Mass of 22kg on a 45o to the horizontal.
\mus = 0.78
\muk = 0.65
Determine the magnitude of the largest force that can be applied upward parallel to the ramp to have the box remain at rest.
AND
Determine the magnitude of the smallest force applied to the top of the box, perpendicular to the ramp, to have the box remain at rest.

Homework Equations


All kinematic-based equations
Newton's Laws
FF = \muFN

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed that the magnitude of the maximum force required would be equal to |FNET| + |FF| I got 2.0 x 102 Newtons of force (correct to two significant digits).

However, the second part, I'm not quite sure of what to do. I thought that if you are applying a force perpendicular to the ramp, you would be increasing the force of gravity perpendicular to the ramp, and since |FN| = |FgN| the normal force would increase. Then I thought the absolute value of the force of friction would have to equal the absolute value of the force of gravity acting parallel to the ramp. In that case, just solve to find the force needed.

I was told I was wrong.

(*side note* I didn't find a use for the kinetic coefficient of friction. I assume that it will be useful, but can't think of how)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sonoftunk said:

Homework Statement


Mass of 22kg on a 45o to the horizontal.
\mus = 0.78
\muk = 0.65
Determine the magnitude of the largest force that can be applied upward parallel to the ramp to have the box remain at rest.
AND
Determine the magnitude of the smallest force applied to the top of the box, perpendicular to the ramp, to have the box remain at rest.

Homework Equations


All kinematic-based equations
Newton's Laws
FF = \muFN

The Attempt at a Solution


I assumed that the magnitude of the maximum force required would be equal to |FNET| + |FF| I got 2.0 x 102 Newtons of force (correct to two significant digits).
Your equation neglects the component of the gravity force acting down the plane, and, in calculating F_f, you first need to calculate the normal force, which is not the same as the box weight.
However, the second part, I'm not quite sure of what to do. I thought that if you are applying a force perpendicular to the ramp, you would be increasing the force of gravity perpendicular to the ramp, and since |FN| = |FgN| the normal force would increase. Then I thought the absolute value of the force of friction would have to equal the absolute value of the force of gravity acting parallel to the ramp. In that case, just solve to find the force needed.

I was told I was wrong.
The applied force perpendicular to the box increases the normal force, not the gravity force. You need to draw a free body diagram and examine all forces perpendicular and parallel to the slope, then apply Newton's laws.
(*side note* I didn't find a use for the kinetic coefficient of friction. I assume that it will be useful, but can't think of how)
Neither can I. Don't let the question trick you. I have to go off line now, so please continue with your attempt, and I would think that one of the night shift owl helpers will assist.
 
Last edited:
I calculated my FNET drawing a FBD and looking at all forces. The only relevant ones were the force of gravity acting parallel to the plane and the force of friction, everything else canceled out. I had 34 Newtons down the plane for Net force.

You made me realize that I did calculate the Normal force wrong (forgot to include cos 45o), which did skew my answer. So force required would be 1.5 x 102 instead.)

Yeah, for the second part, I didn't think it was clear enough. Since I am increasing the normal force, would I not be correct in thinking that it would increase friction, and that I am trying to find an applied force that increases normal force enough so that the force of friction counteracts the net force? That is where I was told i was wrong.
 
sonoftunk said:
I calculated my FNET drawing a FBD and looking at all forces. The only relevant ones were the force of gravity acting parallel to the plane and the force of friction, everything else canceled out. I had 34 Newtons down the plane for Net force.
Well, in order for the box to remain at rest, the net force must be zero, which implies that you must apply a force of 34N up the plane to keep it at rest.
You made me realize that I did calculate the Normal force wrong (forgot to include cos 45o), which did skew my answer. So force required would be 1.5 x 102 instead.)
I'm missing you here. How did you get from 34N to 150N?
Yeah, for the second part, I didn't think it was clear enough. Since I am increasing the normal force, would I not be correct in thinking that it would increase friction, and that I am trying to find an applied force that increases normal force enough so that the force of friction counteracts the net force? That is where I was told i was wrong.
you may have been told you were wrong, because you are trying to find an applied force that increases normal force enough so that the force of friction counteracts the force of gravity down the plane, not the net force. The net force must be zero. Please show your work for this calculation, and i'll give it a look.
 
Okay, well my scanner is on the fritz at the moment, but as soon as I fix it, sure thing.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top