Friction and Resistance - Inertia

AI Thread Summary
Two identical cars, one with a driver and three passengers and the other with just a driver, will reach the bottom of a hill at the same time when only gravity is considered, as weight does not affect the acceleration due to gravity. However, when factoring in wind resistance, the heavier car may reach the bottom slightly faster because it experiences a relatively smaller effect from drag compared to its greater gravitational force. The discussion highlights that while rolling resistance typically increases with weight, wind resistance is a more significant factor in this scenario. Newton's laws illustrate that the acceleration of the heavier car is greater due to the reduced impact of wind resistance. Ultimately, the conclusion is that under ideal conditions, both cars would finish simultaneously, but real-world factors could lead to different outcomes.
keith m
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Two identical cars are at the top of a hill, one has a driver and three passengers, the other just the driver. Both drivers release the hand break at the same time, which would reach the bottom first.

I have used two cars as the example as this will reduce the possible variables such as wind resistance; in this example every condition is the same for both cars other than the weight.

I believe they would reach the bottom at the same time as the only force acting on them is gravity. I am far from being an expert but seem to remember this from my days at college, my colleague argues that the heavier car will reach the bottom first due to momentum gains, please could someone put us out of our misery?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This very experiment was the birth of scientific study.

http://galileo.rice.edu/lib/student_work/experiment95/inclined_plane.html"

It would seem your friend quite literally doesn't know the first thing about science. :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
keith m said:
Two identical cars are at the top of a hill, one has a driver and three passengers, the other just the driver. Both drivers release the hand break at the same time, which would reach the bottom first.

I have used two cars as the example as this will reduce the possible variables such as wind resistance; in this example every condition is the same for both cars other than the weight.

I believe they would reach the bottom at the same time as the only force acting on them is gravity. I am far from being an expert but seem to remember this from my days at college, my colleague argues that the heavier car will reach the bottom first due to momentum gains, please could someone put us out of our misery?

Neglecting wind resistance and differences in rolling resistance due to different car masses, both will reach the bottom at the same time.

More realistically, including wind resistance (but still neglecting rolling resistance), the heavier car will reach the bottom a bit before the other one. Consider two geometrically identical cars of masses m and 2m at speed v down an inclined plane. Both experience the same drag force Fd. The force due to gravity is Fg and 2Fg respectively (this includes trig. factors due to inclined plane). Newtons law gives in the two cases:

Car of mass m:

m*a = Fg - Fd -> a = Fg/m - Fd/m

Car of mass 2m:

2m*a = 2Fg - Fd -> a = Fg/m - Fd/2m

So you see, in the second case a is larger, i.e. the acceleration is larger since the negative effect of wind resistance on acceleration is halved. Also, the terminal speed at which a=0 is larger.

This illustrates the point somewhat crudely. Rolling friction would typically have the opposite effect since the "rolling coefficient of friction" is typically larger for the heavier car, but the wind resistance will dominate in most cases so the point still stands.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
5K
Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
12K
Replies
95
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top