Friction force, and external forces

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of work done on a box being pushed across a tabletop, specifically focusing on the role of friction and how it is classified in terms of external forces. Participants explore the implications of kinetic friction, the work-energy principle, and the definitions of work in relation to different forces acting on the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why the work done by friction is not considered external work, despite friction being classified as an external force.
  • Others argue that the work done by friction is converted to thermal energy, which is why it is not included in the external work calculation.
  • One participant suggests that the forces acting on the box include the applied force, gravity, and friction, but only the applied force does work on the box.
  • There is a discussion about whether the normal force and gravitational force do any work, with some asserting they do not due to lack of movement in their direction.
  • Participants explore the idea that friction can be viewed either as part of the block or part of the table, leading to different interpretations of the work done by friction.
  • Some express uncertainty about when to consider friction as part of the system and when it is external, indicating a lack of clarity in definitions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the classification of the work done by friction or its implications for the energy of the system. Multiple competing views remain regarding the nature of friction and its role in the work-energy context.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include varying interpretations of the definitions of work and energy transfer, as well as the dependence on the perspective taken regarding the role of friction in the system.

daivinhtran
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
If we have a box with mass m placed on a horizontal tabletop. Then we push the box a distance of d. THe coefficient of kinetic friction between the box and tabletop is .35.

When we're asked to find the external work done on the block-table system, it's not the work done by the friction force at all. Why? Can someone explain to me??

My textbook refers the work done by friction is transferred to thermal energy. So they don't call it the external work. But in the previous before, they say friction force is external force.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of you push the box, what forces are acting?

Which of these moves its point of application?

Does our book talk about Work done = energy expended or transferred or some such?
 
Studiot said:
Of you push the box, what forces are acting?

Which of these moves its point of application?

Does our book talk about Work done = energy expended or transferred or some such?

what they say is : W external = W(me on block) + W (gravity on block) + W(gravity on table) + W (floor on table) = W(me on block) + 0 + 0 +0

WHy don't they include the work done by friction?? Friction, of course, is not in the system
 
I'm not being funny, I'm trying to get you to see for yourself.

If you push the box what forces are acting (call it P)

If the block slides along a horizontal table, with or without friction, does the normal reaction or the weight (gravity) force of the block do any work?

Look at the sketch and suppose you push the block from A to B.

At A there is a side thrust P pushing the block along the table.

As the block moves to B the work done by this force is P(xa-xb) since this is in the direction of the line of action of P.

Force R does no work since there is no movement in its direction of action.

Ditto Force W.

Now the friction force, F, is different because, unlike P it moves along with the block so its point of action

is always under the block

This is why F does no work.

You can say if you like, that when the block is at B, F no longer exists at A.

However if we are pushing with with a stick, then P still exists at A when the block has moves to B since the stick must extend back through A to its source.
 

Attachments

  • frict5.jpg
    frict5.jpg
    4.3 KB · Views: 537
Last edited:
but isn't there for a short time and short distance some force Pstatic > P whereby the work done during that short time and short distance is != P(Xb-Xa) ??

i may be wrong, but the work done on moving a block from rest != P(Xb-Xa) ??
 
Studiot said:
Now the friction force, F, is different because, unlike P it moves along with the block so its point of action

is always under the block

This is why F does no work.
I think there are two ways of looking at that, and it depends whether you consider the frictional action to be part of the block or part of the table (or anything between those two extremes).
The view you express above is taking the frictional action to be part of the block. So the work done in pushing the block remains in the block (as heat).
Viewing the frictional action as external to the block, the frictional force is in the opposite direction to the distance moved, so the 'work done' by it is negative and exactly cancels the work done in pushing. In this view, the block gains no energy, the heat now being external to it.
 
Studiot said:
I'm not being funny, I'm trying to get you to see for yourself.

If you push the box what forces are acting (call it P)

If the block slides along a horizontal table, with or without friction, does the normal reaction or the weight (gravity) force of the block do any work?

Look at the sketch and suppose you push the block from A to B.

At A there is a side thrust P pushing the block along the table.

As the block moves to B the work done by this force is P(xa-xb) since this is in the direction of the line of action of P.

Force R does no work since there is no movement in its direction of action.

Ditto Force W.

Now the friction force, F, is different because, unlike P it moves along with the block so its point of action

is always under the block

This is why F does no work.

You can say if you like, that when the block is at B, F no longer exists at A.

However if we are pushing with with a stick, then P still exists at A when the block has moves to B since the stick must extend back through A to its source.

Honestly, I knew the force P does work, and the normal force and weight do no work. It's obvious. My question is only about the friction force.

I'm not saying that you're being funny or anything. If you're not happy, well, I can find other access.
 
haruspex said:
I think there are two ways of looking at that, and it depends whether you consider the frictional action to be part of the block or part of the table (or anything between those two extremes).
The view you express above is taking the frictional action to be part of the block. So the work done in pushing the block remains in the block (as heat).
Viewing the frictional action as external to the block, the frictional force is in the opposite direction to the distance moved, so the 'work done' by it is negative and exactly cancels the work done in pushing. In this view, the block gains no energy, the heat now being external to it.

Thank you :)...I just can't recognize when the frictional action is part of the system and when it's not. :(
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K