Friction in a 3 block and pulley system

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a block and pulley system with friction. The user attempts to derive the minimum mass m3 required for block 1 to start moving relative to block 2, using equations of motion and friction. However, they encounter a potential error in their approach, specifically regarding the sign convention for acceleration in their equations. Other participants point out this inconsistency and confirm that the acceleration should be consistent across all equations. The conversation emphasizes the importance of maintaining a coherent sign convention in physics problems to arrive at the correct solution.
Maximusw47
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block of mass m1 is on top of a block of mass m2. Block 2 is connected by an ideal rope passing through a pulley to a block of unknown mass m3 as shown. The pulley is massless and frictionless. There is friction between block 1 and 2 and between the horizontal surface and block 2. Assume that the coefficient of kinetic friction between block 2 and the surface, μ, is equal to the coefficient of static friction between blocks 1 and 2.
What is the minimum value of m3 for which block 1 will start to move relative to block 2?

Homework Equations


F=ma
f= mu*N

The Attempt at a Solution



I've taken a couple of approaches. The one I think is most valid is this: The point just before block 2 slips relative to block 1 is where the static friction between m1 and m2 reaches its maximum value. At this point the magnitude of acceleration between all the blocks is the same. I'm then solving for:

m1*a = mu*m1*g
m2*a = T-mu*m1*g-mu*(m1+m2)*g
m3*a=T-m3*g

Which gives me:
m3=2*mu*(m1+m2)/(1+mu)

Which is wrong. Am I making a math error or taking the wrong approach entirely?

Thanks in advance for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you post the diagram or facsimile thereof?
 
Maximusw47 said:
m1*a = mu*m1*g
m2*a = T-mu*m1*g-mu*(m1+m2)*g
m3*a=T-m3*g
You have it almost right, except your sign-convention is inconsistent:
"a" is supposed to be the same for all three equations, right?
In the first two equations, "a" takes a positive value, but in the third equation "a" takes a negative value (m3g ≥ T)
 
Nathanael said:
You have it almost right, except your sign-convention is inconsistent:
"a" is supposed to be the same for all three equations, right?
In the first two equations, "a" takes a positive value, but in the third equation "a" takes a negative value (m3g ≥ T)
Got it. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top