Friction, object pulled at an angle, given only (mue) and max tension hmmm

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving friction and tension when an object is pulled at an angle. Participants suggest using calculus to find the angle that maximizes the mass, with one user indicating that the correct angle is approximately 19 degrees. Another user proposes an alternative method using the Bunyakovsky inequality, which leads to a similar conclusion about the angle. The conversation highlights the challenges faced by those who haven't recently studied calculus and the importance of verifying calculations. Overall, the thread emphasizes problem-solving strategies in physics, particularly in relation to forces and angles.
Beamsbox
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Having difficulties with this, I assume that something's supposed to cancel out at some point, but I must be missing something important. If someone could point em in the right direction... Thanks for all your help, once again!

Math_Physics.jpg

(http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f362/BeamsBox/Math_Physics.jpg)

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Very interesting problem. Your initial thought patterns are the same as mine.

I would suggest you try using calculus. I'm not certain this will work though, I'm quite tired.

EDIT: Okay, just worket it through. You've said that Tcos(theta)=muFn.
Rearrange to get Fn.
Substitute this into Fn + Tsin(theta) = mg.

Differentiate mg with respect to theta and let it equal to 0 at maximum.
This should get you the required angle.

What is the correct answer?


BTW, there are probably easier methods, but this is the first one that came to mind.
 
Last edited:
Is this a calculus based physics course? Looking at this the only way i can think of how to do it is with calculus. I'm going to assume it is.
The question is asking at which angle is the mass maximized. There fore you need to find \frac{dm}{d\theta} and set it equal to zero. then you can solve for the angle.
 
The answer in the book is 19 degrees. The course sells itself as having a calculus component, but it's few and far in between in application. I haven't had calc for a handful of years, so I have to thank you all for your help!

I've showed my workings, but still have no verification that I did it correctly. I got 19.3 and assume the book just rounded down. Please let me know if you think this is correct, or if there's something else.
Chapter_6_Problem_17.jpg

(http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f362/BeamsBox/Chapter_6_Problem_17.jpg)

Cheers!
 
Yes, you got it.
There is another way not using calculus. From the last equation (before you take the derivative of it): A=\frac{0.35mg}{T}=0.35sin\theta + cos\theta.
Apply the Bunyakovsky inequality: (ab+cd)^2\leq (a^2+c^2)(b^2+d^2), plus that sin^2\theta + cos^2\theta = 1, you will have A\leq \sqrt{1^2+0.35^2}. The both sides equal only when \frac{a}{c}=\frac{b}{d} or tan\theta = \frac{sin\theta }{cos\theta }=0.35.
 
Thanks for the feedback.

I've never heard of Bunyakovsky... I'll have to look into that.
Thanks once more!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top