Can Friction Force Balance Normal Force in a Vertical Direction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gracy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Video
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between friction force and normal force in a vertical context. It is clarified that the friction force acts parallel to the surfaces in contact and cannot oppose the normal force, which is defined as perpendicular to the surface. The question highlights that without friction between block A and the wall, the weight of block A cannot be balanced. The mention of friction between blocks A and B raises questions about its relevance to the problem. Ultimately, it is concluded that option (d) is correct, as friction cannot balance the normal force in this scenario.
gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83

in this video question no 5 actually it is first question of the video but it's number is 5,i didn't understand this question.first i thought The force acting on block A is its weight in vertically downward direction, with no friction with the wall and Condition for equillibrium: Sigma Fx= 0, Sigma Fy= 0, & Sigma Fz= 0, Hence ,a vertical force can never be balanced by a horizontal force, whatever it (applied force) is, even infinity. Only friction force b/w wall and block A can balance weight of A. But here there is no friction b/w block A and the wall. Hence , option (d) is correct.but then i thought friction force is not necessarily be horizontal it just opposes motion in whichever direction ,so why it can't balance normal force and what about friction force between A &B ,it is especially mentioned in the question coefficient of friction between block b and a so won't it be used in the solution of problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me like d is correct.

The friction force is always parallel to the surfaces in contact, so it cannot possible oppose the normal force on that contacting surface (which by definition of "normal" is perpendicular to the surface.)
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Back
Top