Frictional Force: Static to Kinetic Conversion

AI Thread Summary
Static friction does not convert into kinetic friction; rather, kinetic friction takes over when an object begins to move. Friction is an emergent property resulting from intermolecular forces, and at the moment motion starts, static friction becomes irrelevant while kinetic friction applies. The acceleration of an object can be determined based on the relationship between applied force and the types of friction present. When there is no relative motion, static friction limits the force, but once motion occurs, kinetic friction governs the interaction. Understanding this distinction is crucial for analyzing frictional forces in physics.
cbram
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Does the static friction get converted into kinetic friction while moving
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No.

Friction is an emergent property of underlying intermolecular forces - it's an "effect" of something else.
So one kind of friction does not convert to another kind - better to think this way:

kinetic friction takes over from static friction at the instant the object starts moving.

For an applied force ##F##, with static and kinetic friction ##f_s## and ##f_k## respectively, we can find the acceleration as:
$$a = \begin{cases}
0 &: F<f_s\\
(F-f_k)/m &: F\geq f_s \end{cases}$$

[edited to tidy up the notation]
 
Last edited:
At the instance when f_k take over f_s does f_s becomes zero
 
cbram said:
At the instance when f_k take over f_s does f_s becomes zero
I does not become zero so much as it becomes irrelevant. When there is relative motion, f_s does not apply -- the frictional force between the surfaces is given by f_k. When there is no relative motion, f_k does not apply -- the frictional force between the surfaces is limited by f_s.
 
Thank you very much
 
Note: if ##f## (no subscript) is the friction force, then Newtons law says ##F-f=ma## where

##f=\begin{cases} f_k &: F > f_s\\ F &: F < f_s \end{cases}##

What happens ##F=f_s## technically depends on the wording of the question - which is why I'm being deliberately ambiguous about where the "equality" goes.​
 
Back
Top