Frictionless Floor Multiple Choice

AI Thread Summary
Larry, stuck on a frictionless floor, can only start moving by using conservation of momentum. The discussion highlights that pushing against the floor won't work due to the lack of friction. Spitting is identified as a viable option, with the consensus leaning towards option C, which states that Larry could gain momentum equal to that of his spit. The reasoning emphasizes that momentum conservation is key, while the other options are dismissed. Ultimately, the correct approach for Larry to move is through the act of spitting, leveraging momentum conservation principles.
kajasu88
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Somehow Larry got stuck in the middle of a room with a frictionless floor. Larry is at rest. How could Larry start moving to get to the edge of the room?

A. Push on the floor with his hands or feet. That way the floor could exert a force on him and Larry could accelerate from rest to moving linearly.

B. Push on the floor with his hands or feet. That way the floor could exert a torque on him and Larry could accelerate from rest to rotating.

C. Spit. It's gross, but since momentum is conserved, Larry could gain an the same amount of momentum as the initial momentum of his spit.

D. Spit. It's gross, but since force is conserved, Larry could accelerate.

E. Spit. It's gross, but since momentum is conserved, Larry would have the same speed as his spit.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kajasu88 said:

Homework Statement



Somehow Larry got stuck in the middle of a room with a frictionless floor. Larry is at rest. How could Larry start moving to get to the edge of the room?

A. Push on the floor with his hands or feet. That way the floor could exert a force on him and Larry could accelerate from rest to moving linearly.

B. Push on the floor with his hands or feet. That way the floor could exert a torque on him and Larry could accelerate from rest to rotating.

C. Spit. It's gross, but since momentum is conserved, Larry could gain an the same amount of momentum as the initial momentum of his spit.

D. Spit. It's gross, but since force is conserved, Larry could accelerate.

E. Spit. It's gross, but since momentum is conserved, Larry would have the same speed as his spit.


So you stated the problem. What do you think the answer is and why? We don't do your homework/coursework for you here at the PF.
 
Any thoughts about it?
 
I don't think it has to do with pushing on the floor because if there is no friction, that wouldn't work right? unless they pushed up, but that wouldn't make him go forward.
so spit...
thats all i can htink of right now
 
kajasu88 said:
I don't think it has to do with pushing on the floor because if there is no friction, that wouldn't work right? unless they pushed up, but that wouldn't make him go forward.
so spit...
thats all i can htink of right now

Spitting is part of the right answer. Now which of the 3 spitting choices is correct?
 
kajasu88 said:
I don't think it has to do with pushing on the floor because if there is no friction, that wouldn't work right? unless they pushed up, but that wouldn't make him go forward.
so spit...
thats all i can htink of right now


So what about the spit? There are only 3 left to choose from. Which one do you think it is and why?
 
well it has to be conservation of momentum... don't know about conservation of force...
and has to be c because e would mean that the spit and larry have the same mass.

so C?
 
Yes, it's c.

m_1v_1=m_2v_2
 
Back
Top