From Effective Lagrangian to Feynman Rule

zhangyang
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
In this process:

N*→N+photon

If we want to calculate the amplitude with the following interaction Lagrangian:

upload_2015-4-5_14-34-39.png


(http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0205052)

If we use functional method,the field operator is not polynomial,how to use "center formula"to bring functional derivative in? Or we must drop functional method,and use expension of field operator into annihilation and creation operator to get amplitude ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I honestly don't know how to write the Feynman rules for such a Lagrangian with the path integral formalism. Personally I always found much easier to simply use the canonical expression for the fields and from there write down the rules starting from the creation and annihilation operators.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top