Schools From theoretical physics master to 2nd year grad school

AI Thread Summary
Admittance to a US graduate program directly into the second year after completing a theoretical MSc in the UK is generally uncommon. While some universities may allow waivers for certain core courses based on prior coursework or proficiency demonstrated through grades or evaluation tests, this does not equate to being granted full credit for those courses. Typically, a minimum number of credit hours, often around 45, is still required, meaning students may need to take additional courses even if some are waived. Entering as a second-year student can present disadvantages, such as fewer opportunities to pass qualifying exams compared to first-year students, who often have more chances and familiarity with the examiners. Additionally, the elective courses available to second-year students may not align well with the content tested in qualifying exams. It is advisable for prospective students to directly contact individual graduate programs to clarify their policies and discuss options.
grand_unifier
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I would like to ask if anyone has been admitted to a graduate school(US) straight to 2nd year after a theoretical masters MSc degree in the UK.

I am asking because I would really like to study in the US, preferably on top universities but I don't want to waste another year taking essentially the same courses.

Is this even possible to do? I will be sending emails to each university independently but I guess that I can't really email all of them so I'm asking here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
grand_unifier said:
straight to 2nd year

That's really not a thing in the US.

grand_unifier said:
but I don't want to waste another year taking essentially the same courses.

So there's nothing for you to learn? In that case, why does this take any time? You just zip through the homework and exams.
 
There are many universities with graduate physics programs that might accept you into their program and waive the requirement that you take one or more (core) courses that you might have taken before. Their consideration would no doubt depend on what proficiency you can demonstrate, for example your grade in the course, the quality of your earlier program, perhaps even a evaluation test. I speak from experience that I had some courses waived on the basis of a evaluation test, and/or earlier grades.

Now. notice I said waived, not given credit for it. For example, the physics program typically needs 45 credit hours or about 15 courses. Even if you got 3 courses waived, the university may still require you to get 45 credit hours. You would have the flexibility to replace 3 courses with other courses (which may not be as difficult), but this would not be good (from the students point of view ) as requiring only 39 credit hours. I was offered the option of having a course waived, and I elected to take it anyway. The reason was I could not think of a reason to take another course in it's place, that would be as valuable, even though I had the material before in another university. I needed a course to come up with the 45 credit hours.

As to another question, could you be admitted as a 2nd year student, I should state at my grad school(s), (I presume there are many others) there is some variation as to the length of the program. Some students complete their thesis and requirements in 6 years and some in 8 years. When your done, your done. Someone coming in their "second" year does not necessarily graduate earlier.

There are some cases where, so called "second year status" is a serious disadvantage. I personally know of a case where a person entering as a "second year graduate student" was give only one (only) chance to pass the physics graduate qualifying exam, (before the end of the second year), instead of up to 3 chances for first year students. Added to this the qualifying exam professor graders taught typically core (first year) courses, and had several exam takers in their class. These graders did not know the "second year student" from Adam, and this did not help. The graders might give a student they personally instructed the benefit of the doubt on an answer. I know this is not supposed to happen but I also know it happens.

In addition the courses you take as a second year graduate student (elective) might not be as useful in passing the qualifying exam than taking the first year (core) courses, which may be tested on these exams.

You could be in a much better position by considered as a "first year student".

Of course, it is best to E-mail, or discuss these matters with the specific graduate school and program specifically.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Back
Top