From weatherstation data to solar irradiation on specific surface

AI Thread Summary
A weather station measures solar irradiation in lux from different orientations, and the user seeks to calculate solar irradiance on windows using solar energy formulas. The discussion highlights the importance of converting lux to irradiance, noting that the solar constant is approximately 1 kW/m² or 128 klx, although this varies with conditions like cloud cover. Suggestions include pseudo-calibrating the weather station by directing sunlight into its ports to establish a calibration factor. The user believes that with total radiation data from three orientations, they can derive the irradiance for their window's specific orientation, focusing on beam radiation while assuming negligible diffuse and ground-reflected radiation. The conversation emphasizes the need for accurate calculations to effectively utilize solar energy data.
BM99
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So, at home I have a weatherstation which measures solar irradiation in the east, south and west in lux. I can read in these measured sensordata. From these measurements, I would like to calculate the solar irradiance on my windows. The solar energy formulas could help me with that. The work of Soteris A. Kalogirou explains these phenomens in Chapter two (see http://1.droppdf.com/files/AvIdq/solar-energy-engineering-processes-and-systems-2nd-ed-2014-.pdf).

So for example, I have a window which (which has a slope of 90°, vertical) is oriented 20° from the south (clockwise is positive). I know what the incidence angle is and I know that I should use the formule for 'Total radiation on tilted surfaces' which is explained on page 100-101 in the pdf. Starting from the total irradiation in the east, south and west known from my weatherstation, does someone know how to use these measurements to calculate the total irradiance on my window in W/m²?

I hope this explanation is clear enough!

Thank you in advance.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Converting from lux to illuminance is not obvious here due to the large amount of (spectrally) non-visible sunlight. Fortunately, sunlight is important enough that conversion factors have been developed: the solar constant is, on the Earth's surface, approximately 1 kW/m^2 and also 128 klx. That conversion factor definitely won't work if the sky is overcast and is also less accurate as the sun moves off zenith.

For fun, you may be able to pseudo-calibrate your weatherstation by sending 'direct sunlight' into one of the ports and then use it on clear days; I'd be curious what your results are. Check the user guide- don't damage the optical detector by doing this.

For example- use a mirror to send noontime sunlight into a port, and the weatherstation tells you that it's receiving (say) 100 klx so you have a 'weatherstation calibration factor' of 1.28. Then, the next day (or whenever), your station pointed in the direction of your window gives a reading of 50 klx, which means your window actually receives 64 klx = 0.5 kW/m^2.

good luck!
 
Andy Resnick said:
Converting from lux to illuminance is not obvious here due to the large amount of (spectrally) non-visible sunlight. Fortunately, sunlight is important enough that conversion factors have been developed: the solar constant is, on the Earth's surface, approximately 1 kW/m^2 and also 128 klx. That conversion factor definitely won't work if the sky is overcast and is also less accurate as the sun moves off zenith.

For fun, you may be able to pseudo-calibrate your weatherstation by sending 'direct sunlight' into one of the ports and then use it on clear days; I'd be curious what your results are. Check the user guide- don't damage the optical detector by doing this.

For example- use a mirror to send noontime sunlight into a port, and the weatherstation tells you that it's receiving (say) 100 klx so you have a 'weatherstation calibration factor' of 1.28. Then, the next day (or whenever), your station pointed in the direction of your window gives a reading of 50 klx, which means your window actually receives 64 klx = 0.5 kW/m^2.

good luck!
Thanks for your interesting answer Andy!

I will try that as a validation of my estimation. Somehow, I'm convinced that with the measured total radiation in the three orientations, I could convert these to a total radiation on a window in any orientation. Well maybe not the total radiation, but rather the beam radiation as I suppose the diffuse and ground-reflected solar radiation to be zero. The following formulas should do it i think considering I know every concerned angle.
1623849275732.png

1623849324361.png

1623849176991.png

1623849199849.png
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top