FRW pertubations in overdense and underdense regions

  • Thread starter Thread starter center o bass
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on FRW perturbations, the focus is on understanding the behavior of the metric in overdense regions, specifically why Ψ is negative and Φ is positive. The comparison to the Schwarzschild metric illustrates that in an overdense region, the additional mass behaves like a gravitating body, leading to the conditions stated by Dodelson. The reasoning highlights that the perturbations in the FRW metric reflect the gravitational effects of mass density variations. This connection between the Schwarzschild metric and the perturbed FRW spacetime clarifies the implications of density fluctuations in cosmology. Understanding these relationships is crucial for grasping the dynamics of the universe's structure.
center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
I'm currently reading Dodelson's "Modern Cosmology" where he in Chapter 4.2 discuss the Boltzmann equation for photons and consider a perturbed FRW spacetime for which ##g_{00} = -1 - 2 \Psi## and ##g_{ij} = a^2 \delta_{ij}(1+2\Phi)##. At page 90 he states that "in an overdense region we have ##\Psi <0## and ##\Phi >0##. Why is this true?
 
Space news on Phys.org
center o bass said:
"in an overdense region we have Ψ<0\Psi 0. Why is this true?

I'm not an expert in this area, so I can't give the "standard" answer for why it's true, but I can explain why it seems reasonable to me. Consider the Schwarzschild metric, for which ##g_{00} = - \left( 1 - 2M / r \right) = -1 + 2M / r## and ##g_{rr} = 1 / \left( 1 - 2M / r \right) \approx 1 + 2M / r## (where we are using an approximation in which ##M / r## is small so we can ignore quadratic and higher terms). This obviously looks a lot like the perturbed FRW metric; in fact, if we put the FRW metric in spherical coordinates, the two are the same (except for the scale factor ##a^2##) if we set ##\Psi = - M / r## and ##\Phi = M / r##. So basically, what Dodelson is saying is that in an overdense region, the extra mass (due to the overdensity) acts like an ordinary gravitating body.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
937
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top