Fukushima Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bryan 1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear
AI Thread Summary
Bombarding the Fukushima reactors with alpha particles, protons, neutrons, or electrons is theoretically possible but not technically viable, as it would create more problems than it solves. Neutrons are the only radiation type that could potentially alter radioactivity, but they would likely increase the danger by producing more fission products and plutonium. Effective transmutation of nuclear waste would require separating radioactive elements, a process that would already address the core issues. Current concerns primarily revolve around Caesium-137, which does not effectively absorb neutrons. Overall, any alteration would likely result in increased radioactivity without tangible benefits.
Bryan 1
Is it possible to bombard the reactors at the Fukushima power plant with alpha particles and or protons, and or neutrons and or electrons in a combination that would alter the radioactivity presently being admitted by the failed reactors
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Possible? Sure, why not. Technically viable - no. It would create tons of new problems on top of those we already have.
 
Bryan 1 said:
Is it possible to bombard the reactors at the Fukushima power plant with alpha particles and or protons, and or neutrons and or electrons in a combination that would alter the radioactivity presently being admitted by the failed reactors

Not to make anything better. The only kind of radiation that would do anything is neutrons. Alpha particles and electrons won't penetrate into any material. If you want to transmute anything with them you need tiny samples in vacuum. This is useless here.

If you want to irrediate anything with neutrons, you will have to separate the stuff that will get more dangerous from the stuff that will get less dangerous. Unfortunately there is far more stuff that will become more dangerous than less dangerous. Firing neutrons at the remaining nuclear fuel will produce more fission products and plutonium. You would need to separate all the radiactive elements, and if you had done that you would already have solved the problem

Transmutation of nuclear waste seems only to make sense for transuranic elements, which you could let fission in a reactor to form fission products, which will be much shorter lived. The main problem at this time is Caesium-137. Unfortunately it doesn't absorb neutrons well. It will collect over a few years in a nuclear reactor after all. Firing neutrons at a swimming pool of mostly water with a bit of 137Cs in it isn't useful.
 
  • Like
Likes Bandersnatch
Bryan 1 said:
that would alter the radioactivity presently being admitted by the failed reactors

Sure. The alteration would make everything more radioactive. What is the benefit of that?
 
Back
Top