I Function describing a moving waveform

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter fog37
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Waveform
fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
Hello Forum,
  • I am first wondering about the possibility to factor a function ##f(x,t)## into a product of two functions, i.e. ##g(x) p(t)##. Is there any general rule that tells us if this decomposition is possible based on the characteristics of the function ##f(x,t)##?
  • If a function ##f(x,t)## is to represent a traveling wave, the same waveform ##f(x,t_0)## at time ##t_0## must be translated along the x-axis at later times ##t##: $$f(x-vt)$$
The function ##f(x,t)## and ##f(x-vt)## are the same waveforms, just translated in space by a factor ##vt##.

  • A standing wave is a wave that does not move or travel. For real-valued functions, the function describing a standing wave ca be factored: $$f(x,t)=g(x)p(t)$$ This means that the spatial function ##g(x)## is not translated but just modulated by the temporal function ##p(t)##. However, if the function ##g(t)## is not periodic, I think the product ##f(x,t)=g(x)p(t)## does not represent a standing wave but a traveling wave! Is that correct? could anyone provide further insight into this?
Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Why don't you simply take a standing wave and then make position time dependent instead of a translation?
 
Sorry fresh_42, I am not sure what you exactly mean. So, let's say we have function $$f(x,t)= [sin(x)] [e^{3t}]$$

where ##g(x)=sin(x)## and ##p(t)=e^{3t}##. What do you exactly suggest doing at this point?
 
fog37 said:
Sorry fresh_42, I am not sure what you exactly mean. So, let's say we have function $$f(x,t)= [sin(x)] [e^{3t}]$$

where ##g(x)=sin(x)## and ##p(t)=e^{3t}##. What do you exactly suggest doing at this point?
This is a wave with an increasing amplitude, not a moving wave. I thought, a wave is ##f(x)=A(x)\cdot \sin(\omega x)## if you want to have a variable amplitude. Now just make the position time dependent, ##x=x(t)##, e.g. ##x=v \cdot t## which in this case with a constant velocity is the same as considering the variable as time flow.
 
Actually, the function I gave seems to not be a moving wave: the spatial structure is a sine wave and the amplitude at each point, as you mention, increases exponentially with time. I don't see any oscillatory behavior or translational behavior.

A function like ##f(x,t)= sin(x) cos(t)## is instead a standing wave: the wave does not move but the amplitude at each point oscillates harmonically in time since ##cos(t)## is periodic.

I am still wondering if, given an arbitrary spatial function ##g(x)##, we can multiply it by a temporal function ##p(t)## and obtain a traveling wave ##f(x,t)=g(x) p(t)##...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top