Functional Derivative: Computing the d'Alembert Solution

parton
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
In the literature (Ryder, path-integrals) I have found the following relation for the functional derivative with respect to a real scalar field \phi(x):

i \dfrac{\delta}{\delta \phi(x)} e^{-i \int \mathrm{d}^{4} x \frac{1}{2} \phi(x) ( \square + m^2 ) \phi(x)} = ( \square + m^2 ) \phi(x) e^{-i \int \mathrm{d}^{4} x \frac{1}{2} \phi(x) ( \square + m^2 ) \phi(x)}

But how do I compute this? I am just confused about this d'Alembert operator \square and I never end up with the right solution as above.

Could anybody explain how to obtain this solution, please?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It would help if you show us your steps until the point where the d'Alembert operator is causing problems.

Using the Minkowski metric (+---) (c=1) the d'Alembert operator is given by \partial_{tt}-\partial_{xx}-\partial_{yy}-\partial_{zz}. With this you can evaluate the integral \int d^4 x \; \phi(x) \square \delta \phi(x) using partial integration. What do you know about the volume integrals that appear due to partial integration? Try it for \int d^4x \; \phi(x) \partial_{xx} \phi(x). The other terms work exactly the same.
 
Ok, my problem is the following. If I consider

i \dfrac{\delta}{\delta \phi(x)} e^{-i \int \mathrm{d}^{4} x \frac{1}{2} \phi(x) m^2 \phi(x)}

I could write the exponent as -i \int \mathrm{d}^{4} x \frac{1}{2} m \phi^{2} and use some kind of product rule and obtain:

i \dfrac{\delta}{\delta \phi(x)} e^{-i \int \mathrm{d}^{4} x \frac{1}{2} \phi(x) m^2 \phi(x)} = m^2 \phi(x) e^{-i \int \mathrm{d}^{4} x \frac{1}{2} \phi(x) m^2 \phi(x)}

Ok, that seems to be correct, but now I if want to compute

i \dfrac{\delta}{\delta \phi(x)} e^{-i \int \mathrm{d}^{4} x \frac{1}{2} \phi(x) \square \phi(x)}

I can not rewrite the exponent in such a form like above and otherwise I don't really know how to build the derivative.

I just differentiated the first \phi(x) and obtained


= \dfrac{1}{2} \square \phi(x) e^{-i \int \mathrm{d}^{4} x \frac{1}{2} \phi(x) \square \phi(x)}

where I have a factor 1/2 which is wrong, but I don't know how to derive this correctly.
 
You have treated \square \phi(x) as a constant now, but it is not a constant.

Take the variation of the argument of the exponent.

\delta \int d^4x \; \phi(x) \square \phi(x) = \int d^4x \; \left[ \delta \phi(x) \square \phi(x) +\phi(x) \square \delta \phi(x) \right]

Now integrate the second term by parts.
 
Ok, I integrated the second term by parts (2 times) and finally obtained the correct result.

Thanks a lot for your help :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top