A Functional equation f(x)^n f(a - x) = 1

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jonas Hall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functional Scale
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a function f(x) that satisfies the functional equation f(x)^n f(a - x) = 1, particularly for cases where n ≠ 1. For n = 1, a solution f(x) = x/(a - x) has been established, but there are concerns about meeting the boundary conditions f(0) = 0, f(a/2) = 1, and f(a) = ∞. The participants explore using Taylor and Laurent expansions to derive solutions, noting that exponential forms do not satisfy the required conditions. There is a suggestion to investigate antisymmetric functions and the behavior of Φ as its arguments approach zero. The conversation highlights the complexity of finding suitable functions for different values of n while adhering to specific boundary conditions.
Jonas Hall
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Hi,

In a problem I have been working on for a while now I have found that I want to find the function satisfying the functional relation

f(x)n f(a - x) = 1

for n = 1 I believe I have proven that f(x) = x/(a - x). On this page is an answer I do not quite understand. One of the prerequisits for f(x) in my problem was that f(0) = 0, f(a/2) = 1 and f(a) = ∞. I have difficulties seeing that the answer provided will satisfy f(0) = 0.

Apart from this, I have made no progress what so ever in adressing the case where n ≠ 1. In particular I have failed to find solutions for when n = 2.

The problem is this: I want to make a scale mapping where f(x) represents the value and x represents the position of the scale such that the graph of 1/xn is a straight line from positions (0, a) through ((a/2, a/2) to (a, 0), representing the values (0, ∞) through (1, 1) to (∞, 0).

How can I go about finding f(x) for n ≠ 1?

Oh, and I don't have any problem with not getting to solve it myself - I you know the answer, please just tell me!
 
  • Like
Likes DuckAmuck
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For ##n=1## the general solution is of the form ## e^{\Phi(x,a-x)}## where ##\Phi## is antisymmetric so ##f(x)f(a-x)=e^{\Phi(x,a-x)+\Phi(a-x,x)}=e^{\Phi(x,a-x)-\Phi(x,a-x)}=1##, so your equation is satisfied. After it specify the solution in the case where ##\Phi(x,a-x)=C(2x-a)##. For ##n=2## I don't see other solutions than ##f(x)=1## ...

You can assume that ##f## admits a Taylor expansion of the form ##f(x)=a_ {0}+a_{1}x+ a_{2}x^2+...## you can put this into your equation and use a math program in order to find relations with coefficients ... You will obtain an infinite system of equations to solve ...
 
f(x) = 1 does not satisty f(0) = 0. Nor does any exponential solution... Your suggestion with taylor expansions seem interesting though, I will attempt it when I have some more time.
 
ok, before I spoke about the problem in general I didn't consider the boundary condition. So in this case the exponential is not your solution ... If you want this condition you can search directly a Taylor (or better Laurent (with negative exponents)) expansion of this kind ##f(x)=a_{1}x+a_{2}x^{2}+\cdots ##
 
I would try a Laurent expansion around x=a. We know f(0)=0 so there Taylor and Laurent would be identical. This could limit the function too much.

The approach with an antisymmetric Φ should still work, if you let Φ go to -infinity if its first argument goes to zero.
 
  • Like
Likes Ssnow
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top