Fundamental Frequency of a nano scale oscillator (graphene)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around estimating the fundamental frequency of vibration for graphene nanoribbons, likening them to strings in classical mechanics. The tension in these nanoribbons is challenging to determine, but one suggested method involves calculating the force based on atomic bond energy. It is noted that the vibration characteristics differ from those of a string due to the beam-like properties of the ribbon, particularly when tension is zero, leading to amplitude-dependent oscillations. Young's Modulus is highlighted as a crucial factor for estimating the natural frequency, and the thickness of the ribbon may further influence its behavior. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of modeling the dynamics of nanoribbons in a mechanical context.
maguirpi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, long time lurker, first time poster.

I've just begun a phd which involves nanoribbons (a small strip of a 2D material connected at either end to a larger 'bulk' section of the same 2D material). A question has occurred to me. These nanoribbons look a lot like a piece of string in a violin/sonometer (although the tension is obviously not easily tuneable). This means that they should have a frequency of vibration like a piece of string in classical experiments. I'd really like to estimatethis (for fun, not homework or anything like that).

Using electron and ion microscopy we know what the width, height and breadth are. We know the density as we know the material. So basically in the equation attached, what we don't know is the tension. I guess this is going to be quite small anyway. The only thing I can think to do is estimate the number of atoms at each end and use the bond energy/distance. This will allow me to calculate a total force and use this as my upper bound on tension. I'm totally open to other ideas though, maybe using material properties or a different approach. My classical mechanics might be rusty too!

If you need anything clarified as well please just ask.

Thanks in advance for your help,
Maguirpi
 

Attachments

  • GNR.JPG
    GNR.JPG
    14.8 KB · Views: 526
  • FF.JPG
    FF.JPG
    2.3 KB · Views: 445
Physics news on Phys.org
The vibration of a string is based on the assumption that the tension is independent of the displacement and that the restoring force is determined by displacement. Frequency is then not dependent on amplitude.

With a ribbon having zero tension at the zero displacement, the frequency of oscillation will be amplitude dependent. It will flap like a flag in the wind.
 
I suspect your "ribbon" is better described as a beam fixed at both ends. If you know Young's Modulus (or since grapheme is unlikely to be an isotropic material, the relevant modulus along the length of the ribbon) you can estimate the lowest natural frequency here: http://faculty.uml.edu/pavitabile/22.403/web_downloads/Frequencies_of_Common_Systems.PDF

If there is any axial tension the frequency will increase. See here:
http://www.vibrationdata.com/tutorials2/beam_axial_load.pdf

Since a beam has some elastic stiffness when the tension is zero, unlike a string, the effect of amplitude on frequency will to be second-order, so you can ignore it for reasonably small vibration amplitudes (i.e. when amplitude is the same order of magnitude as the thickness of the ribbon)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This certainly is an interesting question.

Maybe it comes down to the thickness of the ribbon. Being described as 2D suggests a zero thickness which makes it more like a catenary chain than a beam.

There will be a mode where the ribbon oscillates sideways within its 2D plane. That will certainly conform to the beam model and have a higher frequency than waves propagating along the same catenary chain. The frequency will be independent of the ribbon thickness.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top