Fundamentals of Engineering Exam Question about the Test

AI Thread Summary
The Lindenberg book suggests memorizing around 30 elements and their oxidation numbers for the Fundamentals of Engineering Exam. However, there is uncertainty about the relevance of this information due to recent changes in the exam format. Many believe that memorization is unnecessary, as the exam should provide all the required information to solve problems. It's important to verify the current exam guidelines to ensure effective study preparation. Ultimately, relying on updated resources and official exam information is crucial for success.
enokoner
Gold Member
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I'm studying using the popular Lindenberg book. It suggest I have to memorize about 30 elements and their respective oxidation numbers. However, the book was written before they revamped the exam. Anyone know if I still have to memorize this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I doubt very much you have to memorize anything. They should provide all the information you need to solve the problems.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top