Fusion reactors are neutron sources AKA fission bomb factories?

In summary, fusion reactors are easily obtainable and provide a neutron source, which is the "difficult bit" in the enrichment of uranium and plutonium. It is not correct to say that fusion reactors are bomb factories, as fission bombs are produced without fusion reactors. If cars have neutron sources all of civilization will be irradiated anyway.
  • #1
ardnog
52
29
Assumptions:

1) Fusion reactors are easily obtainable. Every spacecraft or hover-car has one.

2) Fusion reactors are neutron sources.

3) Neutron sources are the "difficult bit" in the enrichment of uranium and plutonium.

4) Uranium and plutonium are "freely" available in asteroids or uninhabited planets.

Conclusion:

Fusion reactors are bomb factories?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ardnog said:
3) Neutron sources are the "difficult bit" in the enrichment of uranium and plutonium.
Not correct. Enrichment (of raw material) is done by centrifuges (or some other means of isotope separation). Turning the (non-fissile) raw material to fissile material is, what's done with neutron radiation.

But when a civilization already has stable fusion, they are expected to had some experiences with unstable fusion too. Creating fissile bombs with stable fusion is like creating polished stone axes with a precision lathe. You need to think up some really serious issues with those brains there to make something like this work in a plot.
 
  • #3
So you're saying that at this point, everyone can make nukes in their workshop?

What technologies would exist to prevent the end of civilisation by mad bombers?
 
  • #4
ardnog said:
So you're saying that at this point, everyone can make nukes in their workshop?
North Korea? They yet to have stable fusion (:wink:) but they already have fusion boosted fission bombs with technology level around the 60's.

ardnog said:
What technologies would exist to prevent the end of civilisation by mad bombers?
Fear :oops:
 
  • #5
By "everyone" I mean everyone from parts in the hardware store; not governments.
 
  • #6
I have read many sci-fi, mystery and action novels that feature non-government construction of fission bombs without the need nor any mention of fusion reactors.

I cannot remember title or author but a representative novel from the late 1980's featured a young disaffected physicist building a portable fission bomb in her home from hardware store items and stolen lab materials. Much of the story detailed her troubles and successes building the device.

Of course this is all fiction, written for audiences who came of age under threat of nuclear war.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
You need to have quite an industrial and financial background. Also, some safe grounds no one else is interested in.

So it's definitely on the level of governments. Won't work below that. (Not any realistic way.)
 
  • #8
If cars have neutron sources all of civilization will be irradiated anyway.

Uranium is found in meteorites at around 10 parts per billion on average. A villain could do some work and extract a kilogram of uranium from 100,000 tons of asteroid. Maybe 10,000 tons if there is a convenient concentrated asteroid. A 1,000 ton rod dropped from Earth escape will deliver more explosion than the bombs the USA dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. A rod can enter with a heat shield and shatter it at optimal altitude. The rod can be partially hollow to optimize and shape the burst.

The proliferation of neutron sources will stimulate a proliferation of neutron detectors. There will be people looking for hovercars with leaky shields. There will be illegal dumping of low level waste.

Chemically separating plutonium from the irradiated uranium is going to be roughly equivalent to separating plutonium from high level nuclear waste. While doing the irradiation you have to fuse a lot of fusion fuel and some of your plutonium fissions. Using the fusion you have a bright heat source that could be noticed. You have to store or dump your fission byproducts somewhere. The USA has 77,000 tons of high level waste. I hope it is not easy to snatch a few fuel rods but modifying a fusion reactor sounds hard too.

I heard that making the implosion device was the hardest part of the Manhattan project.
 

1. What is a fusion reactor?

A fusion reactor is a type of nuclear reactor that uses the process of nuclear fusion to generate energy. This process involves combining two or more atomic nuclei to form a heavier nucleus, releasing a large amount of energy in the process.

2. How does a fusion reactor work?

A fusion reactor uses a combination of extreme heat and pressure to fuse atomic nuclei together. This is achieved by heating a gas of hydrogen isotopes to temperatures of millions of degrees, which causes the nuclei to collide and fuse together, releasing energy.

3. Are fusion reactors safe?

Fusion reactors are considered to be much safer than traditional fission reactors, as they do not produce radioactive waste or pose a risk of a meltdown. However, there are still safety concerns related to handling and storing the materials used in fusion reactions.

4. Can a fusion reactor be used as a weapon?

Fusion reactors can potentially be used to create nuclear weapons, as the process of fusion releases a large amount of energy. However, the technology and materials used in fusion reactors are highly regulated and closely monitored to prevent this from happening.

5. What are the advantages of fusion reactors?

Fusion reactors have the potential to provide a nearly limitless source of clean energy, as they use readily available materials and do not produce greenhouse gas emissions or long-lived radioactive waste. They also have a much higher efficiency and energy output compared to traditional fission reactors.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
46
Views
12K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
0
Views
734
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top