Fusion Terminology: Is it Fission or Fusion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the classification of nuclear reactions, particularly whether certain reactions should be labeled as fusion or fission. A key point is that while fusion typically involves the merging of nuclei to form a larger nucleus, the reaction between boron-11 and hydrogen-1, which produces three alpha particles, challenges this definition. Participants argue that the energy released in this reaction is primarily due to the low binding energy of hydrogen-1, supporting its classification as fusion. Additionally, the technology for harnessing energy from this reaction aligns more closely with fusion reactors than fission reactors. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the complexity of nuclear reaction terminology and the nuances in categorizing reactions based on energy dynamics and practical applications.
Khashishi
Science Advisor
Messages
2,812
Reaction score
490
Ok, I am a fusion physicist, but I still don't know what the strict criterion is for calling a nuclear reaction a fusion reaction. Yes, it's a collision between two nuclei that results in a bigger nucleus. But, then ^{11}B + ^{1}H \rightarrow 3 \alpha is usually called a fusion reaction. Isn't it more like fission?

Is it called fusion because most of the energy released comes from the low binding energy of hydrogen-1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
^{11}B+ ^1H\rightarrow 3\alpha starts with two particles (on the left) and ends with one particle (on the right). Isn't that what "fusion" means?
 
HallsofIvy said:
^{11}B+ ^1H\rightarrow 3\alpha starts with two particles (on the left) and ends with one particle (on the right). Isn't that what "fusion" means?
^{11}B+ ^1H\rightarrow \alpha + \alpha + \alpha

How about now?
 
  • Like
Likes Toast
@Bandersnatch: :D

That reaction could be both, fusion and fission.
I think (something with protons)+(something with protons) -> (something) is fusion. It might be followed by a fission reaction.
 
I agree that the p+B reaction doesn't fit into the typical cookie cutter textbook definition of "fusion." But IMO its the best label.

Its helpful to at the binding energies per amu

H-1 is 0. MeV/amu
He-4 is 7.07 MeV/amu
B-11 is 6.93 MeV/amu

Notice that B-11 and He-4 have roughly the same binding energy per amu. This means that most of the energy (7.1 out of 8.7 Mev) released is coming from the conversion of hydrogen to helium. Thus from an energetic standpoint I argue that this is a fusion reaction.

Also the technology required to extract power from this reaction is similar to other fusion reactors but very different from a typical fission reactor. Thus I also argue that from a practical standpoint it useful to categorize p+B with other fusion reactions.

Note that p+B is not unique. If you look up the CNO cycle you'll see that there are several intermediate fusion reactions that involve H reacting with an medium sized nucleus resulting in helium and a smaller product nucleus. Example (H+N-15 = He-4 + C-12).
 
Bandersnatch said:
^{11}B+ ^1H\rightarrow \alpha + \alpha + \alpha

How about now?

:smile: good one!
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Back
Top