Galilean transform of the Laplacian

cartonn30gel
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm trying to show that the wave equation is not invariant under Galilean transform. To do that I need to figure out how the Laplacian transforms from S to S'. I seem to have trouble understanding why the laplacian actually changes.

Homework Equations



x'=x-vt, t'=t

The Attempt at a Solution



Just consider the second derivative wrt x in cartesian coordinates:

\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x'^2}=\frac{\partial}{\partial x'} \frac{\partial}{\partial x'} = (\frac{\partial x}{\partial x'} \frac{\partial}{\partial x}) (\frac{\partial x}{\partial x'} \frac{\partial}{\partial x}) = \frac{\partial}{\partial x} \frac{\partial}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}

So if you do the same for all three components, it looks like the Laplacian just transforms as it is. But I know that this is not right. Any help??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you go from your 3rd step to the 4th one?
 
Matterwave said:
How did you go from your 3rd step to the 4th one?

\frac{\partial x}{\partial x'} = 1 since x'=x-vt according to Lorentz transform, and v is constant since we are talking about an inertial reference frame.
 
Can anybody help?
 
the Laplacian doesn't change the invariance comes from the function you apply it to i.e. from f(x,t) -> f(x',t')

and aren't you supposed to be considering the d'Alembertian for a wave equation
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top