Why is non-collinear momentum not considered in this analysis?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum photon energy required to dissociate deuterium into a proton and neutron, considering two scenarios: both particles moving collinearly and the neutron remaining stationary. The minimum photon energy is determined to be 1874.78 MeV for the first case and 936.78 MeV for the second, factoring in the binding energy of 2.22 MeV. Non-collinear momentum is not considered because it complicates momentum conservation, leading to uncertainty in calculations. The participants emphasize that energy conservation must account for both binding energy and kinetic energy in these scenarios. Overall, the analysis highlights the complexities of energy and momentum conservation in particle interactions.
matt222
Messages
130
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A Gamma photon is used in order to dissociate deuterium into a proton and neutron. the binding energy is 2.22Mev anf the rest energies for the proton and neutron are 938Mev and 939Mev respectively. determine the minmum photon energy to achieve this. consider two cases:
1- both proton and neutron acquire collinear equal velocities parallel to the photon momentum
2-the neutron stays staionary after the collission
3- why non-collinear not considered in this analysis


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



my answer for 1:

Binding energy= (total number of proton and neutron)- minimum photon energy

2.22=939+938-E(MINIMUM)

E(MINIMUM)=1874.78Mev

for part 2:

since the neutron is stationary so this mean we have a zero energy for neutron and we will left only with proton energy and the minimum photon energy in this case would be:

E(MINIMUM)=939-2.22=936.78Mev

for part 3:

for non-collinear this is because the momentum is not conserved
 
Physics news on Phys.org
no one have an idea for my Q if i am on the wr8 track o not
 
59 viewers no one can help me
 
Hi matt222,

I believe the binding energy is equal to the difference in rest mass between the combined proton+neutron and the separated proton and neutron. An energy of 2.22 MeV is required to separate the proton and neutron. If the energy added were exactly equal to the binding energy, then the proton and neutron would end up with zero kinetic energy.

However, in this case, with a high energy photon causing the separation, more than just energy needs to be conserved. What does that mean the minimum photon energy needs to be?
 
binding energy can also be the minimum energy required to decompose a molecule, an atom, or a nucleus into its components. So I agree with alphysicist.
 
matt222,

For your answer to part 3: Could you explain your reasoning more fully? What leads you to that conclusion?
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top