Gamma Ray Spectroscopy - 97 keV Peak for U238 Metal

AI Thread Summary
A gamma spectrum analysis of a 39-gram U-238 metal sample revealed a significant peak around 97 keV, which was also observed in a 5-gram Uranium Oxide sample. The source of this peak is unclear, as it does not appear in the U-238 decay chain documentation. Some participants speculated that the peak could be related to X-ray characteristic emissions from uranium. Additional resources were shared, including links to gamma spectra and decay modes that might provide further insights. The discussion highlights the need for more research to understand the origins of the 97 keV peak in U-238.
Developer_CM
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I recently acquired a 39 gram sample of U-238 metal. I ran a gamma spectrum on the sample and found a major peak around 97 keV. I couldn't find any documents that mentioned this peak for U-238, but it is very prominent.

I ran a gamma ray spectrum on a 5 gram Uranium Oxide sample and it also exhibits the gamma ray peak around 97 keV.

Does anyone know how this gamma-ray peak is being generated? I've looked at the decay chain for U-238, but could not find any references to a 97 keV peak.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Developer_CM said:
Does anyone know how this gamma-ray peak is being generated? I've looked at the decay chain for U-238, but could not find any references to a 97 keV peak.

well i became curious also and a google search gave me an spectra of uranium soil sample and there was a good peak at around 100 keV
you may see the following
http://www.stratamodel.com/gamma.htm
i will look further to elicit more info ;thanks
 
  • Like
Likes Developer_CM
Thanks,

I will visit the link and review the information.
 
  • Like
Likes drvrm and Developer_CM
Indeed. These K transitions appear to be right near the measured 97 keV peak. Thanks for the reply.
 
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top