Gamma rays may have devastated life on Earth: Newscientist.com

AI Thread Summary
A recent discussion highlights the theory that a gamma-ray burst (GRB) may have triggered a significant mass extinction event on Earth 443 million years ago. Participants question the existence of trace residues that would indicate such an event, with one contributor referencing their book for further insights. There is curiosity about what specific remnants could be expected from a GRB and whether they would still be detectable today. The conversation emphasizes the need for more data on GRB frequency and energy to understand their potential impact on life. This topic continues to spark interest in the relationship between cosmic events and Earth's biological history.
Astronomy news on Phys.org
What does a frequency vs GRB-energy (integrated gamma energy above the atmosphere) plot look like? There should be enough data collected by now. Extrapolating this, and making some general assumptions about the source distribution, how many 'devastating to life on Earth' GRBs might there have been in the last 1 billion years?
 

Possibly...however, there would be trace residules left..and there are not. For a better idea (perhaps) read the chapter on reoccurring extinctions from my book "Losing Faith" for a sustainable and provable argument.
 


Originally posted by theEVIL1
Possibly...however, there would be trace residules left..and there are not. For a better idea (perhaps) read the chapter on reoccurring extinctions from my book "Losing Faith" for a sustainable and provable argument.
What 'trace residules' would you expect there to be?
 
That's what I'm wondering as well. surely he doesn't mean left over gamma rays?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...

Similar threads

Back
Top