Gasoline Engine Turbocharger Concept.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an innovative rear-mounted turbocharger concept for gasoline engines, proposing a unique exhaust routing to enhance efficiency. The design suggests using pulse-matched headers leading to a larger exhaust pipe, with the turbo mounted at the front of the vehicle to maintain optimal exhaust temperatures and reduce backpressure. Concerns are raised about the effectiveness of cooling exhaust gases, as it may lead to energy loss and poor turbo performance. The conversation emphasizes the importance of minimizing distance and maximizing pipe size to improve turbo response and drivability. Overall, the proposed setup aims to outperform traditional and rear-mounted turbo systems, but practical considerations about energy retention and turbo dynamics are crucial for success.
Chevalade
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Conventional turbocharging is done from the manifolds. Or as close to as possible.

In the last few years, a company (STSturbo) came out that designed a system for rear mounted turbos, that seems to work well.

What I am ultimately trying to figure out is the most efficient way of turbocharging a gasoline engine.

I came up with this idea.

Normal pulse matched headers, going into a y exhaust setup (say 3 1/2") running to the back of the car, mking a u turn, then up to the front, where the turbo is mounted sideways (So the compressor inlet faces grille)

Now plumb compressor straight into intercooler.

Dump turbine exhaust behind front tire.

Compressor inlet has filter on it poking into grille.

REASONING.

1. Exhaust temps to turbo would be at atmospheric temp or close to. (Denser, pulse matched and you would not lose velocity, you would gain because of size of piping used?)

2. Turbo would run 2x as cool as a conventional or rear mount.

3. Oiling is easier to plumb.

4. Turbine exhaust has little to no backpressure.

This setup should make more power than either setup. (Traditional or rear mount)

Questions I have are...

1. Must the turbo have the heat element in it to function optimally?

2. Would you need to have a smaller turbine housing with cool air pushing the turbine? or would a larger turbine housing work the same?

3. Out of the 3 setups mentioned which would produce the greater amount of compressed air (boost)

This is more for a personal project than anything. So any insight would be appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
Any chance of some sketches? I'm finding it hard to picture your proposal.
 
The problem with this, and with the STS kits, - and their general reasoning at least in their sales pitch- is that YES, the gas because denser... This does not mean it has more energy or capability to drive a turbine.

I don't want to go too crazy, but both pressure and temperature contribute to the energy content of a gas. The point of a turbine, is to pull that energy out of a gas and turn it into usable mechanical work, in this case to turn a compressor. Their logic is fundamentally flawed in that cooling the gasses does NOT drive the compressor better, in fact you are LOOSING energy which can be harnessed to do work, in the form of lost thermal energy. This is accompanied by a drop in pressure. Overall, this drop in energy hurts the maximum amount of energy available for the turbocharger. Now, here is where they get away with it: Turbocharger systems operate with a wastegate, which routes exhaust gasses around the turbine, because they are sized such that the available energy is more then what is required by the compressor to achieve a requested boost level. So, all that *really* gets hurt is the spool up time / lag, and they combat this by using smaller, more restrictive housings, which hurts overall system flow and thus power.

It works ok, for a budget system. Their marketing is very decieving and well, pretty much incorrect, but a lot of people believe it anyways. I would definantly NOT take this system to the extreme by doubleing the distance to the turbocharger, in fact if one wanted to improve uppon the STS systems the first place I would start is with major insulation of the exhaust system on the way to the turbocharger in order to keep this energy in the system.

FYI, on higher horsepower setups (I build turbo honda's and vw's in my spare time) we often see 30-50psi gauge pressure in the exhaust manifold before the turbocharger, at tempuratures up to 1700 degrees F... Drop that temperature down to near ambient, and the pressure decrease this will come with, your going to have one VERY poor running turbocharger.
 
YOU WANT A VERY SHORT PIPE TO THE TURBO AS BIG AS POSSABLE
study race car turbos they do it that way BECAUSE IT WORKS
yes turbo's get HOT , cold gas has little energy = low power

remember the big trade off in turbo's is drivability
too slow a responce [called spool] makes a poor driving car

I own and drive two turbo cars a gas volvo and a diesel M-B
 
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Calculate minimum RPM to self-balance a CMG on two legs'
Here is a photo of a rough drawing of my apparatus that I have built many times and works. I would like to have a formula to give me the RPM necessary for the gyroscope to balance itself on the two legs (screws). I asked Claude to give me a formula and it gave me the following: Let me calculate the required RPM foreffective stabilization. I'll use the principles of gyroscopicprecession and the moment of inertia. First, let's calculate the keyparameters: 1. Moment of inertia of...
Back
Top