Gauss' Law - difficulty understanding this example

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding Gauss' Law in relation to a long straight wire and a surrounding cylindrical shell. It clarifies that the electric field is zero inside the metal cylinder due to the absence of enclosed charge for certain radii. The charge per unit length on the inner surface of the cylinder is -λ, which neutralizes the electric field from the inner wire's positive charge. This negative charge on the cylinder's inner surface is necessary to prevent the electric field from penetrating the metal. The explanation highlights the importance of charge distribution in maintaining electric field behavior in conductive materials.
NewtonianAlch
Messages
453
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img851.imageshack.us/img851/5741/86853377.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



For the long straight wire, the charge per unit length λ is already given, this is distributed on the surface of the wire. The electric field is zero for anything less than r1, because there is no enclosed charge inside the metal.

In the solutions booklet it says that the charge per unit length for the inner surface of the cylinder is -λ so that the internal charge adds to zero for r2 < r < r3.

What do they mean by that, and how did they get -λ ?

I understand that for r greater than r2, but less than r3, the same principle applies as it did earlier, the charge is on the surface, and no enclosed charge inside the metal, so therefore the electric field is zero inside. But why is -λ the charge per unit length for the inner surface of the cylinder?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The charge on the inner wire attracts an opposite charge to the inner surface of the cylinder. This charge is what neutralizes the electric field over the transition into the metal cylinder. Otherwise the electric field due to the charge on the inner wire would extend through the metal cylinder, and we know that this doesn't happen!
 
Ah yes, that makes sense now that you put it that way! Of course...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top