Gauss' Law: Enclosed Cylinder in a Hollow Shell

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at a distance of 0.172m from the central axis of a non-conducting cylinder with a charge density of p = a*r, and determining the surface charge density inside a hollow metallic cylindrical shell. For the electric field calculation, the user recognizes that the equation derived for charges within the cylinder does not apply outside the shell, as the shell has no net charge. The second part of the problem involves confusion about using the electric field to find surface charge density, with the user attempting to convert volume charge density to linear charge density. Ultimately, the user expresses uncertainty about the correct approach and calculations for both parts of the problem. Clarifying the application of Gauss' Law in this context is essential for accurate solutions.
snakeums
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A long non-conducting cylinder has a charge density p = a*r, where a = 4.73 C/m^4 and r is in meters, and a radius of 0.0437m . Concentric around it is a hollow metallic cylindrical shell with an inner radius of 0.119m and an outer radius of 0.158m.

1) What is the electric field at 0.172m from the central axis? Answer in units of N/C.
2) What is the surface charge density inside the hollow cylinder? Answer in units of C/m2.

For part 1 I've already solved a few equations for charges at various radiuses along the inside of the cylinder, between the cylinder and the shell, etc, and I have the equation of (a*r^3)/(3*R*ε0), but I know this won't work because the radius is now outside the shell. I know the shell has no net charge, conceptually, so the charge outside is negative... but I'm still not sure what my R is for this equation.

For the second part I'm almost totally lost. The E = (/sigma)/ε0) doesn't make sense to me unless I'm supposed to get E for the radius JUST inside of the shell and use that.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm thinking you're right about the second part, so all you technically need is the electric field. To make things simpler, you could convert the volume charge density to a linear charge density. The metallic shell doesn't devote to the electric field outside of it, so you could rely on the derived equation for outside the shell and near the inner surface of the shell.
 
Well I tried the second part by using (a*r^3)/(3*R*ε0), where r = 0.0437 and R = 0.119 to get E. Then I multiplied by ε0 again to get the (surface charge density) but I got 0.011056 which was wrong. So I guess I'm more lost than I thought.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top