Gaussian 09 .out file format specification (and freqchk)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the lack of comprehensive documentation for the output of Gaussian 09 runs, specifically regarding the .out files. Users find the output files human-readable but challenging to interpret due to unclear units and formats. It is noted that there is no official specification for these files, and while the Gaussian website provides user guides and IOps manuals, detailed programmer references are not freely available. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the methods used in calculations to make sense of the output. A specific inquiry about whether normal modes in the .out file and freqchk are in mass-weighted or Cartesian coordinates is addressed, confirming that they are in Cartesian coordinates. Users are encouraged to refer to the user manuals for some guidance but often resort to running test calculations for clarity.
surfer96313
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone could tell me where the documentation exists for the output of Gaussian 09 runs. The .out file is plain text and human readable, but I can only decipher parts and units are not always clear. I would have thought the Gaussian website would have an explicit format FAQ or spec, but I cannot find it.

Any help would be appreciated,
Cheers,
--Jim Parker
Physics and Astronomy
University of Texas at San Antonio
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I've written programs that read Gaussian log files, (which is a major pain, as there are slight changes between every version) and as far as I know, there's no official specification at all. But everything is normally in atomic units. Hartrees/Angstroms, or Hartrees/Bohrs. Formchk files are documented in the programmer's reference book, at least for G03.

Frankly though, the log files are pretty straightforward - if you know what the program is doing. So if it's unclear, you might need to read up on the method(s) you're using. There's an extensive list of references in the manual.
 
alxm,
Thanks for the info. I guess I'll have to ask our IT department if they have the copy of the programmer's reference book, since they handled the purchase of the software. Unless you know of another source. The Gaussian website only freely releases the user's guide and IOps manuals as far as I can tell.

There is a one page synopsis of freqchk in the G09 & G03 user's manuals, which gives some detail, but doesn't help the immediate question I have, which is simply -- are the normal modes that are listed in the .out file and freqchk using mass-weighted coordinates or simply cartesian.

I'm going to just run a simple calculation with H2O to find out, which will work. But I was hoping that there was a simple reference manual that would be definitive on what is printed so that I wouldn't have to "rediscover" what each line of output means.

Cheers,
--Jim
 
surfer96313 said:
There is a one page synopsis of freqchk in the G09 & G03 user's manuals, which gives some detail, but doesn't help the immediate question I have, which is simply -- are the normal modes that are listed in the .out file and freqchk using mass-weighted coordinates or simply cartesian.

Cartesian. Although if you've got symmetry it outputs two geometries ('input orientation' and the symmetrizied 'standard orientation') and I can't remember offhand which of those two coordinate systems they're in, although it should be fairly obvious once you visualize the vectors. In formchk files, all coordinates are usually in Bohrs IIRC, although there might be a number that specifies the unit. (again recalling from memory)
 
[Solved] Re: Gaussian 09 .out file format specification (and freqchk)

alxm,
Excellent! Thank you.

Cheers,
--Jim
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top