Gaussian integral w/ imaginary coeff. in the exponential

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the integral ∫e-i(Ax2 + Bx)dx, particularly when the coefficient A has an imaginary part. It is established that for A with a positive imaginary part, the integral converges due to the decaying magnitude of the integrand. In contrast, if A is real, the integral does not converge strictly; however, a finite result can sometimes be obtained by substituting A with A + iε and taking ε to zero at the end. This method involves interchanging limits, which may lead to non-unique results depending on the path of integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis fundamentals
  • Gaussian integral techniques
  • Understanding of analytic functions
  • Limit interchange principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Gaussian integrals with complex coefficients
  • Learn about the properties of analytic functions in complex analysis
  • Explore the concept of contour integration in the complex plane
  • Investigate the implications of limit interchange in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying complex analysis or integral calculus, particularly those interested in advanced techniques for evaluating integrals with complex coefficients.

thoughtgaze
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
So I've seen this type of integral solved. Specifically, if we have

∫e-i(Ax2 + Bx)dx then apparently you can perform this integral in the same way you would a gaussian integral, completing the square etc. I noticed on wikipedia it says doing this is valid when "A" has a positive imaginary part. I can see why that might be important, we would then have an overall decaying magnitude of the integrand, as opposed to purely oscillating.

What if A has no imaginary part, how would one go about doing such an integral?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If A is real, then the integral does not strictly converge. However, sometimes you can get a finite answer by replacing ##A \to A + i \varepsilon## and then take ##\varepsilon \to 0## at the end of the calculation.

What you're doing here is interchanging the order of limits, which is not really allowed. The answer you get, although finite, might not be unique (i.e., there are many sequences of converging integrals that approach your diverging one, and we've only looked at one such sequence).
 
You have not said anything about the curve you are integrating along or whether x is real or complex. For example: If x is complex and you integrate over a circle anywhere in the complex plane, the answer is 0 (since the integrand is analytic).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K