Gaussian Surface and Charge Density

AI Thread Summary
A solid dielectric sphere with a radius of 10 cm has a uniform charge distribution, resulting in an electric field of 8.6 x 10^4 N/C at a distance of 5 cm from its center. The calculated electric field at 15 cm from the center is 76.4 kN/C, directed radially outward. The discussion explores the application of Gaussian Law to derive electric field equations for both inside and outside the sphere, using total charge (Q) and charge density (ρ). It concludes that both methods yield the same result, with the choice of solving for Q or ρ being the only difference. Understanding these calculations is essential for applying Gaussian Law effectively in electrostatics.
whitehorsey
Messages
188
Reaction score
0
1. A solid dielectric sphere of radius 10 cm has an electric charge uniformly distributed throughout its volume. The electric field at 5 cm from the center of the sphere is 8.6 x 10^4 N/C, pointing radially outward. Calculate the magnitude and direction of the electric field at a point 15 cm from the center of the sphere.

2. Gaussian Law


3. I solved it like this:

E(4∏r2) = Q(r3/a3)/ ε0
E = Qr/4∏ε0a3
Q = 1.91 * 10^-7C
E = kQ/r2
= 76.4kN/C radically outward.

My question is what is the difference between doing it the above way versus with charge density:
Finding r < a (inside the sphere)
Equation: E(4∏r2) = 4/3(∏r3)ρ/ ε0
ρ = 4.5666 *10^-5

Find r > a (outside the sphere)
E(4∏r2) = 4/3(∏a3)ρ/ ε0
E = 76.4 kN/C radically outward
 
Physics news on Phys.org
whitehorsey said:
1. A solid dielectric sphere of radius 10 cm has an electric charge uniformly distributed throughout its volume. The electric field at 5 cm from the center of the sphere is 8.6 x 10^4 N/C, pointing radially outward. Calculate the magnitude and direction of the electric field at a point 15 cm from the center of the sphere.

2. Gaussian Law3. I solved it like this:

E(4∏r2) = Q(r3/a3)/ ε0
E = Qr/4∏ε0a3
Q = 1.91 * 10^-7C
E = kQ/r2
= 76.4kN/C radically outward.

My question is what is the difference between doing it the above way versus with charge density:
Finding r < a (inside the sphere)
Equation: E(4∏r2) = 4/3(∏r3)ρ/ ε0
ρ = 4.5666 *10^-5

Find r > a (outside the sphere)
E(4∏r2) = 4/3(∏a3)ρ/ ε0
E = 76.4 kN/C radically outward

None really. If you use ρ=Q/((4/3)*pi*a^3) (charge/volume) and substitute into your second equation for E(4*pi*r^2) you get the same formula as you used in the first part. The only difference is whether you choose to solve for Q first or ρ first.
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
None really. If you use ρ=Q/((4/3)*pi*a^3) (charge/volume) and substitute into your second equation for E(4*pi*r^2) you get the same formula as you used in the first part. The only difference is whether you choose to solve for Q first or ρ first.

Thank You!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top