GEBRA: Representation and Operations of Matrices - FAQs

  • Thread starter Thread starter rollcast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
rollcast
Messages
403
Reaction score
0
I'm just revising my maths notes on matrices and I have a couple of questions, mainly about representation of matrices.

1. I have drawn the matrices in my notes with square brackets, curved brackets or straight lines and curved ends. I always just copied what the slide show or board notes had up at the time.

Is it preferable to draw matrices with one type of bracket around them compared to another?

2. When calculating the determinant of the matrix I have used delta, Δ, to represent the det. of the matrix but I can't find reference to the use of delta anywhere else?

3. When writing the inverse of a matrix I haven't divided the entities of the matrix by the determinant. I have just writing it as 1 / det. and put this in front of the matrix?

Is this correct or should I get rid of the 1/det. by multiplying it into the matrix?

Thanks
AL
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rollcast said:
I'm just revising my maths notes on matrices and I have a couple of questions, mainly about representation of matrices.

1. I have drawn the matrices in my notes with square brackets, curved brackets or straight lines and curved ends. I always just copied what the slide show or board notes had up at the time.

Is it preferable to draw matrices with one type of bracket around them compared to another?

This doesn't matter that much. All are used. However, I advize you not to use straight lines as this might be used for the determinant.

2. When calculating the determinant of the matrix I have used delta, Δ, to represent the det. of the matrix but I can't find reference to the use of delta anywhere else?

This is indeed not a common notation. Commonly, the notation det(A) is used. Using delta isn't wrong, but you must state clearly that it signifies the determinant.

3. When writing the inverse of a matrix I haven't divided the entities of the matrix by the determinant. I have just writing it as 1 / det. and put this in front of the matrix?

Is this correct or should I get rid of the 1/det. by multiplying it into the matrix?

Both are ok. However, multiplying it into the matrix is cleaner.
 
Thanks Micro, I looked back and the straight line ones where determinant.

The use of delta must be set by the exam board as its used on their mark scheme solutions for matrix questions.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top