Gene expression during gastrulation

AI Thread Summary
To experimentally compare gene expression during gastrulation in birds and frogs, several methods can be utilized, each with distinct advantages. Microarrays are effective for screening multiple genes simultaneously but may not be ideal for direct comparisons between species due to species-specific primers. In situ hybridization is recommended for tracking the timing and location of gene expression, while RT-PCR can identify individual genes but lacks regional specificity. For quantitative comparisons, using quantitative RT-PCR with highly conserved genes allows for the same primers to be employed across species, enabling a more accurate assessment of gene expression levels. The choice of method ultimately depends on the research objectives, whether focusing on broad gene screening or specific gene expression patterns.
jones106
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I've got a developmental question for yall. How would you experimentally compare gene expression during gastrulation in birds with that in frogs?
I've been racking my brain trying to think of this, and the only way I can think of is to use a microarray, since it allows you to look at so many different genes. However, I'm not sure if this is useful for comparing gene expression in two different animals. Can you use this method? Is there some sort of recombination/transplantation/knockout experiment you could use? Thanks.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
I think in-situ hybridization is the way to go
 
If you're just looking for the time course of when genes get turned on, either approach would work. It depends on what your overall objectives are. If you're just trying to screen for many genes at once, microarray is good for that. If you have just one in mind, in situ hybridization will work, with the benefit of giving you information on where expression is occurring. RT-PCR could also be used to identify individual genes, but without the regional specificity of in situ hybridization.

None of these methods would work well to compare levels of expression quantitatively between two different species, because they all would require species-specific primers. However, if you had a gene of interest that was highly conserved between the two species, so that you could use the same primer, then you could use quantitative RT-PCR to compare the amount of gene expression.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Popular article referring to the BA.2 variant: Popular article: (many words, little data) https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/17/health/ba-2-covid-severity/index.html Preprint article referring to the BA.2 variant: Preprint article: (At 52 pages, too many words!) https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.02.14.480335v1.full.pdf [edited 1hr. after posting: Added preprint Abstract] Cheers, Tom

Similar threads

Back
Top