General Integral Question (not a specific problem)

Asphyxiated
Messages
263
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



My book states that "The only way that we can show that the function f(x) = \sqrt {1 + x^{4}} has an anti-derivative is to take a definite integral,

\int^{x}_{0} \sqrt {1 + t^{4}} dt

This is a new function that cannot be expressed in terms of algebraic, trigonometric or exponential functions without calculus."

What are they really saying here? I don't understand the point. Why is the anti-derivative of
f(x) = \sqrt {1 + x^{4}} an integral? And why do we switch the variables from x to t with respect to t?

Second Part Of My Question

From my book:

"The Fundamental Theorem can also be used to find the derivative of a function which is defined as a definite integral with a variable limit of integration. This can be done without actually evaluating the integral."

Examples:

Let

y = \int^{2}_{x} \sqrt{1+t^{2}} dt

then

y = - \int^{x}_{2} \sqrt{1+t^{2}} dt

and

dy = -d( \int^{x}_{2} \sqrt{1+t^{2}}dt) = -\sqrt{1+x^{2}} dx

My question here arises from the same thing, why do they take a negative integral before taking a derivative and why does the derivative switch from t dt to x dx? The only reason I can see from the example is that x is the upper limit of the integral.. is that why?

A second example given:

Let

y = \int^{x^{2}+x}_{3} \frac {1} {t^{3}+1} dt

Let

u = x^{2}+x

Then

\frac {du}{dx} = (2x+1) ... y = \int^{u}_{3} \frac {1}{t^{3}+1} dt

\frac {dy}{du} = \frac {1}{u^{3}+1}

then by the chain rule

\frac {dy}{dx} = \frac{dy}{du}\frac{du}{dx} = \frac{1}{u^{3}+1} (2x+1) = \frac {2x +1} {(x^{2}+x)^{3} +1}

I have basically the same questions as before here, so any advice would be great.

The only thing that is after this in my book is questions for the chapter so I am kind of at a loss right now.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually never mind, I got it, thanks anyway!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top