General inverses of trigonometry function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the definitions of the inverse sine function as presented by Wikipedia and a textbook. Wikipedia's statement, "sin(y)=x ⇔ y=arcsin(x)+2kπ," is criticized for not providing all possible solutions, particularly for angles like 2π/3. The textbook's formulation, "sin(y)=x ⇔ y=(-1)^{k}arcsin(x)+kπ," is deemed more comprehensive as it accounts for additional solutions. The distinction between "arcsin(x)" as the principal value and "Arcsin(x)" as the general inverse is highlighted, emphasizing the importance of capitalization in mathematical notation. Ultimately, both sources can be correct, but the textbook offers a more complete perspective on the inverse sine function.
kntsy
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
I find this statement confusing from Wikipedia:



sin(y)=x\Leftrightarrow y=arcsin(x)+2k\pi\ \forall\ k\in\mathbb Z


Is this statement false? "arcsin(x)" gives the principal value:[\frac{-\pi}{2},\frac{\pi}{2}]. Therefore,specifically, "arcsin(x)" gives \frac{\pi}{3}\text{ but not}\frac{2\pi}{3}.



My textbook:

sin(y)=x\Leftrightarrow y=(-1)^{k}arcsin(x)+k\pi\ \forall\ k\in\mathbb Z

I think my textbook's statement is more "complete".Or are the 2 statements both true?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes your textbook is giving all the solutions, while wikipedia is missing about half of the possible solutions. Take y=2\pi/3 for example, wikipedia won't return that solution with its formula while the other will.
 
kntsy said:
I find this statement confusing from Wikipedia:



sin(y)=x\Leftrightarrow y=arcsin(x)+2k\pi\ \forall\ k\in\mathbb Z


Is this statement false? "arcsin(x)" gives the principal value:[\frac{-\pi}{2},\frac{\pi}{2}]. Therefore,specifically, "arcsin(x)" gives \frac{\pi}{3}\text{ but not}\frac{2\pi}{3}.



My textbook:

sin(y)=x\Leftrightarrow y=(-1)^{k}arcsin(x)+k\pi\ \forall\ k\in\mathbb Z

I think my textbook's statement is more "complete".Or are the 2 statements both true?
Look more closely at your textbook. Most texts use "Arcsin(x)" to mean the "principal value" of arcsin(x)- the value y such that sin(y)= x for 0\le y< \pi.

Notice the difference? The CAPITALIZED A means the principal value, the small a arcsine, the more general value.
 
Regarding capilatization conventions, Berkey/Blanchard: Calculus, 3rd ed. 1992, write, "Be careful to note that Tan-1 x means the inverse of the function y = Tan x , not (tan x)-1." Where Tan is the "restricted tangent function" with domain (-pi/2, pi/2) and range (-infinity, infinity). "The alternatives y = Arc tan x and y = arctan x are also frequently used to represent y = Tan-1 x." Even so, they call Tan-1, the "inverse tangent function", and Sin-1 the "inverse sine function" (for -1 <or= x <or= 1 and -pi/2 <or=y <or= pi/2, the inverse sine function is defined by y = Sin-1 x iff x = sin y). So for them, at least, it seems that arc- and Arc are interchangeable.
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top