General Relativity, form of scale factor

deadringer
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
We are given a form of Einstein's field equations:

3R'' = -pR
R''R + 2((R')^2) = p(R^2)

where p is a constant and R' = dR/dt

Assuimg that R and R' are both positive, we are asked to show that the general solution is R(t) = A*[(t-ti)^(2/3)]

I'm very confused about this. If we substitute the required expression into the given equations it doesn't solve them! This indicates to me that there might be a mistake, but it' an old Oxford exam paper from the Maths department, so it should be reliable. N.b if you solve the above equations simultaneously you should get an exponentially increasing function for R(t).
Either the quesion is wrong or there is something I'm not seeing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is p supposed to be an energy density? If so then they sort of resemble the Friedmann equations with no pressure if you adjust a coefficient or two. And if p is constant the solution is exponential alright. On the other hand the solution you've given is for matter driven expansion - which is pressureless alright. But energy density=p is not constant in that case p*R(t)^3 is. I'm confused too.
 
We are given a form of Einstein's field equations:

3R'' = -pR
R''R + 2((R')^2) = p(R^2)

where p is a constant and R' = dR/dt
If p is constant the equations are independent and may not have a simultaneous solution. I'm confused too.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top