General solution of differential equation

captainjack2000
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
1. The question asks me to show that e^x is a solution of xy'' - (2x+1)y' + (x+1)y=0 and find the general solution.



2. I managed to simplify the equation to u''xe^(x) - u'e^(x) = 0 by letting y=ue^(x) and finding the differentials and substituting them in.
I've then let z=u dz/du=u' and d^2z/du^2 = u''
so I get xe^(x)(d^2z/du^2) - e^(x)dz/du = 0
How would I solve this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
use integration by parts
 
Sorry but I am still confused;

if xe^(x)(d^2z/du^2) - e^(x)dz/du = 0
can I simplify this to

x(d^2z/du^2) = dz/du

xdz = du
xz = u +c but z = u?
xu = u +c
How does this help find the general solution?
 
captainjack2000 said:
1. The question asks me to show that e^x is a solution of xy'' - (2x+1)y' + (x+1)y=0 and find the general solution.



2. I managed to simplify the equation to u''xe^(x) - u'e^(x) = 0 by letting y=ue^(x) and finding the differentials and substituting them in.
I've then let z=u dz/du=u' and d^2z/du^2 = u''
so I get xe^(x)(d^2z/du^2) - e^(x)dz/du = 0
How would I solve this?

You don't solve that! It has two independent variables, u and x. Surely, you don't mean "let z=u dz/du=u' and d^2z/du^2 = u''. If you let z= u, then dz/du= 1. Perhaps you meant "let z= u, dz/dx= u'". But in that case you've gained nothing- you've just renamed u. Much better is "let z= du/dx, dz/dx= d2u/dx2". Then your equation becomes the first order equation xe^(x) z'- e^(x) z= 0. I would be inclined to first divide the entire equation by e^(x)!
 
Hi can someone please help me with: general solution of dy/dx - y = x + 2x^2

i know how to find general solutions but only when i can separate the y and x in 2 sides and multiply with dx and dy. someone please help me. i have looked in many books
 
It is NOT good idea to add on to someone elses's thread. People who have already responded to the thread may not even look at your post. Use the "new thread" button on the main menu. In this case, I have already responded on the thread you did start about 4 minutes later!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top