Generalized coordinates and the Lagrangian

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the degrees of freedom (D.O.F) of a mass connected to two springs, identified as two coordinates, leading to a conclusion of 2 D.O.F. The user expresses confusion regarding the term "variables of integration" and seeks clarification on its meaning. They attempt to derive the Lagrangian using kinetic energy and potential energy but struggle with the notation and definitions, particularly regarding the variables involved. There is uncertainty about the meaning of terms like ##R## and ##\vec{r}##, as well as the status of ##\vec{r_1}##. The conversation highlights the need for clearer notation and definitions to facilitate problem-solving.
GLD223
Messages
14
Reaction score
7
Homework Statement
Find the degrees of freedom of the system with the given PE. What are the variables of integration? Find the Lagrangian using the generalized coordinates.
Relevant Equations
##PE = 1/2 * k_1 * R^2 + 1/2 * k_2 * (\vec{r} - vec{r_1})^2## note that ##r## and ##r_1## are vectors
So I think the mass can only move in two "coordinates" the axis of which the mass is connected to ##k_1## and the axis connecting it to ##k_2##. Therefore, the D.O.F is 2. I don't understand what it the meaning of "variables of integration" What does it mean?
Apart from that, I attempted to solve for the Lagrangian:
##T = 1/2 * m * v_m^2##
V is given
##v_m = d/dt(x_m)##
##x_m = 1/2 * \vec{r_1} + something* \hat{y} = 1/2 * r_1 * \hat{x} + something* \hat{y}##
I have no clue how to solve this. Any help would be appreciated
 

Attachments

  • Physics_hw_sucks.png
    Physics_hw_sucks.png
    6.4 KB · Views: 82
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,
The problem statement is a complete mystery. No idea what ##R## is, nor what ##\vec r## is. Is ##\vec r_1## fixed? Given?

Sort out your notation. V is given means V=PE ?

##x_m## ? "##something##" ?

##\ ##
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top