Generalized Velocity: Lagrangian

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
WWCY
Messages
476
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Screen Shot 2017-12-04 at 9.58.27 PM.png

[/B]
In this example, I know that I can define the horizontal contribution of kinetic energy to the ball as ##\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{x} + \dot{X})^2##.

In the following example,
Screen Shot 2017-12-04 at 9.58.16 PM.png


Mass ##M_{x1}##'s horizontal contribution to KE is defined as ##\frac{1}{2}m(\dot{X} - \dot{x_1})^2##. Why is this? I have a hunch that it is due to the "origin" (##X## line) ##x_1## and ##x_2## originate from, though I can't exactly put my finger on the exact reason.

Assistance is greatly appreciated!

2. Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2017-12-04 at 9.58.27 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-12-04 at 9.58.27 PM.png
    3.9 KB · Views: 1,388
  • Screen Shot 2017-12-04 at 9.58.16 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2017-12-04 at 9.58.16 PM.png
    4.7 KB · Views: 907
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It has to do with the way the generalized coordinates are defined. In the top drawing ##\dot{x}## increases to the right (although not clear from the double arrow) so the velocity relative to the ground is ##\dot{X}+\dot{x}##. In the second drawing, ##x_1## increases to the left while ##X## increases to the right, so the relative velocity would be ##\dot{X}-\dot{x_1}##.
 
kuruman said:
It has to do with the way the generalized coordinates are defined. In the top drawing ##\dot{x}## increases to the right (although not clear from the double arrow) so the velocity relative to the ground is ##\dot{X}+\dot{x}##. In the second drawing, ##x_1## increases to the left while ##X## increases to the right, so the relative velocity would be ##\dot{X}-\dot{x_1}##.

Thanks for the response,

Would I be right to say that this is also the result of vector addition? Edit: With ##x_1## being defined as positive vector