Geodesic in 2D Space: Understanding the Statement

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on understanding the statement regarding timelike geodesics in a 2D space defined by the metric ds² = (1/u²)(-du² + dv²). The key conclusion is that the geodesics are represented by the equation u² = v² + av + b, where a and b are constants. The Euler-Lagrange equations are utilized to derive the necessary conditions for the geodesics, leading to the identification of a constant C from the Lagrangian L = (1/u)√((dv/du)² - 1). This approach clarifies the relationship between the variables involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 2D Riemannian geometry
  • Familiarity with the Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Knowledge of timelike geodesics and their properties
  • Basic proficiency in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of geodesics in Riemannian geometry
  • Learn about the application of the Euler-Lagrange equations in physics
  • Explore the concept of Lagrangians in the context of general relativity
  • Investigate the implications of the normalization condition for geodesics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in mathematics and physics, particularly those focusing on differential geometry, general relativity, and the study of geodesics in curved spaces.

vidi
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am having trouble understanding how the following statement (taken from some old notes) is true:

>For a 2 dimensional space such that ds^2=\frac{1}{u^2}(-du^2+dv^2)
the timelike geodesics are given by u^2=v^2+av+b where a,b are constants.




Homework Equations


Euler-Lagrange, Normalisation condition


The Attempt at a Solution



When I see "geodesics" I jump to the Euler-Lagrange equations. They give me
\frac{d}{d\lambda}(-2\frac{\dot u}{u^2})=(-\dot u^2+\dot v^2)(-\frac{2}{u^3})\\<br /> \implies \frac{\ddot u}{u^2}-2\frac{\dot u^2}{u^3}=\frac{1}{u^3}(-\dot u^2+\dot v^2)\\<br /> \implies u\ddot u-\dot u^2-\dot v^2=0
and
\frac{d}{d\lambda}(2\frac{\dot v}{u^2})=0\\<br /> \implies \dot v=cu^2
where c is some constant.

Timelike implies \dot x^a\dot x_a=-1 where I have adopted the (-+++) signature.

I can't for the life of me see how the statement results from these. Would someone mind explaining? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do not expand the Euler-Lagrange equations. But do a trick like this:

The Lagrangian is:

L = \frac{1}{u}\sqrt{\left(\frac{dv}{du}\right)^2-1}= \frac{1}{u}\sqrt{v&#039;^2-1}

Now you see this doesn't depend on $v$. The Euler Lagrange equations then give:

0=\frac{\partial L}{\partial v}=\frac{d}{du}\frac{\partial L}{\partial v&#039;} \Longrightarrow \frac{\partial L}{\partial v&#039;}=C

Now calculate \frac{\partial L}{\partial v&#039;} from the Lagrangian and put it equal to the constant C. This will lead to a differential equation which gives the solution you were looking for.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Thaakisfox, I've got it now!
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K