MHB Geometric Distributions Anyone?

nicole58
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
View attachment 3720

I'm struggling with question 10. I'm not sure how to account for the different time? I'm probably just overthinking it. I have attached a picture of the answer as well.View attachment 3721

Again, trying to figure out question #10
 

Attachments

  • ImageUploadedByTapatalk1418827637.962462.jpg
    ImageUploadedByTapatalk1418827637.962462.jpg
    40.3 KB · Views: 74
  • ImageUploadedByTapatalk1418827784.033936.jpg
    ImageUploadedByTapatalk1418827784.033936.jpg
    27.4 KB · Views: 82
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi nicole58,

Welcome to MHB! :)

Ok, let's start with calculating how she would win on the first try of the year. Any idea how you would do that?

It seems for this problem the order matters, which is strange for lottery type games but given the answer that is how this game is played. So what is the chance she wins the game on her very first try?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top