Solving Geometric Series: Find x Values |r|<1

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the values of x for which geometric series converge, specifically addressing the series 2 + 4x + 8x^2 + 16x^3 and 5 + 25(3x + 4) + 125(3x + 4)^2. The convergence condition for the first series is established as |r| < 1, leading to the conclusion that -1/2 < x < 1/2. For the second series, the ratio is identified as r = 5(3x + 4), and the next step involves solving the inequality |5(3x + 4)| < 1, which simplifies to -1 < 5(3x + 4) < 1. After solving this inequality, the correct range for x is found to be -7/5 < x < -19/15. The discussion also touches on the geometric interpretation of modulus and how it relates to the convergence of series.
Briggs
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I am having a little trouble with some questions on geometric series'
For example, Find the values of x for which the following geometric series converge
I have done the first one easy enough
2+4x+8x^2+16x^3...
r=2x
|r|&lt;1
|x|&lt;\frac{1}_{2}
\frac{-1}{2} &lt; x &lt; \frac{1}_{2}

But then it gets more difficult and adds more to the question for example
5+25(3x+4)+125(3x+4)^2
I get r=5(3x+4)
so |5(3x+4)|&lt;1

But then I am stuck as to what to do next any hints on how to go about these questions would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the same kind of story to explicitate the modulus...

\left|a\right|&lt;b\Leftrightarrow -b&lt;a&lt;b

Thankfully,the ratio is linear in "x"...

Daniel.

EDIT:Halls,this is the kind of terminology i had been used to in high school.Always the teacher said about "modulus explicitation" (sic!)...
 
Last edited:
"explicate the modulus"?? Wow! Them big words is too much for me!

Briggs, what dextercioby means is: |5(3x+4)|< 1 is exactly the same as

-1< 5(3x+4)< 1. Now solve for x.
 
HallsofIvy said:
"explicate the modulus"??

It's explicitate! :-p
 
Thanks for the help, it seems quite simple now that you have shown me the next step, I get

-1&lt;15x+20&lt;1

\frac{-1-20}{15}&lt;x&lt;\frac{1-20}{15}

\frac{-7}{5}&lt;x&lt;\frac{-19}{15}

Which is the correct answer so thanks a lot for the help :smile:
 
To help vizualize this geometrically, imagine a point P on the number line. Then, all points X that are strictly inside a distance d from the fixed point P, are given by the equation : |X-P| < d

In other words, this means that X is the set of points in (P-d, P+d). This follows directly from the definition of the modulus :

Definition : |x| = x if x > 0 and |x| = -x if x <= 0

Derivation of Geometric Statement : |X-P| = X-P if X > P and |X-P| = P - X, otherwise (from def'n.)

In the first case (when X > P), |X-P| < d means that X-P < d or X < P+d. So : P < X < P+d

In the second case (when X <= P) |X-P| < d means that P-X < d or X > P-d. So : P-d < X <= P

Combining the above two cases, you see that |X-P| < d gives P-d < X < P+d.

Example : |ax + b| < d is the same as writing |ax - (-b)| < d, which translates as "the distance of points ax from the point b is less than d. So, b-d < ax < b+d, or (b-d)/a < x < (b+d)/a
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top