Geometric vs Componentwise Vector Addition

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining which conditions would confirm that two sets of vector expressions define the same vector C_vec. Participants express confusion about the problem and seek clarity on the conditions that could validate the equivalence of the expressions. Key conditions include comparing lengths, directions, and components of the vectors. There is a general request for suggestions or answers to aid in solving the problem. Overall, the thread highlights the complexity of understanding geometric versus componentwise vector addition.
linie18
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Which of following sets of conditions (A - F), if true, would show that the expressions 1 and 2 above define the same vector C_vec as expressions 3 and 4?

1. The two pairs of expressions give the same length and direction for C_vec.
2. The two pairs of expressions give the same length and x component for C_vec.
3. The two pairs of expressions give the same direction and x component for C_vec.
4. The two pairs of expressions give the same length and y component for C_vec.
5. The two pairs of expressions give the same direction and y component for C_vec.
6. The two pairs of expressions give the same x and y components for C_vec.

Homework Equations



1. C=\sqrt{A^2 +B^2 -2 A B \cos(c)},
2. \phi = \sin^{-1}\left(\frac{B\sin(c)}{C}\right).
3. C_x = A + B\cos(\theta),
4. C_y = B\sin(\theta).

The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it would be one where you knew exactly what the vector was like AF and I don't know what I'm missing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
linie18 said:
Which of following sets of conditions (A - F), if true, would show that the expressions 1 and 2 above[/color] define the same vector C_vec as expressions 3 and 4?

Haven't you forgotten to include something[/color]?
 
whats the answer?
 
Any suggestions or answers on this problem yet? I'm having confusion on the same exact problem. I'm trying to search for help for on this problem. It seems to be a confusing one to answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top