Geometrical meaning of Curl(Gradient(T))=0

AI Thread Summary
The equation ∇×∇T=0 indicates that the gradient of T does not exhibit any curl around a point, meaning there is no circulatory motion in the vector field of ∇T. The gradient of T represents the direction of maximum increase of T, and at any point on a curve of constant T, ∇T is perpendicular to that curve. In a small neighborhood around any point, the vectors of ∇T do not form a circulatory pattern, which implies that a paddle wheel placed in the fluid would not rotate. This aligns with the concept of conservative fields, where the curl of the force field derived from a scalar potential T is zero. Stokes' Theorem further supports this by showing that the integral of the gradient along a closed path results in no change in potential, reinforcing that curl(grad T) must equal zero.
Titan97
Gold Member
Messages
450
Reaction score
18
What is the geometrical meaning of ##\nabla\times\nabla T=0##?

The gradient of T(x,y,z) gives the direction of maximum increase of T.
The Curl gives information about how much T curls around a given point.

So the equation says "gradient of T at a point P does not Curl around P.
To know about how much T curls around a particular point, I need to know about the direction of T on other points around the required point.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Suppose that ## T = T(x,y) ##. Then the equations ## T(x,y) = const ## will describe curves of constant ## T ## in the ##x##-##y## plane. At any point on a given curve, ## \nabla T ## will then be perpendicular to that curve. Imagine the whole vector field of the ## \nabla T ##'s everywhere. Within a small neighborhood around any given point, these vectors will not have a "circulatory" pattern. That is, if the ## \nabla T ## vectors represented fluid velocities, then around any point, a small paddle wheel placed in the fluid would not rotate. That is the geometric meaning of ## \nabla \times \nabla T = 0 ##.
 
  • Like
Likes Titan97 and jedishrfu
The gradient of a magnitude is the flux through and infinitesimal closed 3D area divided by this area. I don´t thik infinitesimals as a serious mathematical concept, but you can translate to differentiation formal way.
 
I find it helpful to think about conservative fields here. A force field grad T is a conservative field because it is derived from a scalar potential T. Now any circulatory path through a conservative field results in no change in potential, since it starts and ends at the same point. Hence curl of the force field must be zero, intuitively. You could prove that using Stokes Theorem: 0 = integral of gradT.dr along a circulatory path = surface integral of curl (gradT) .dS. Can only happen for all possible closed paths if curl(gradT) =0
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top