Schools German Universities for International Students - Science PhDs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on selecting a German university for pursuing a PhD in a science-related field, with a focus on the presence of international students. Participants emphasize the importance of personal passion for the subject over the prestige of the university. While some suggest that attending a well-respected university can enhance career opportunities through networking and obtaining strong recommendation letters, others argue that genuine interest in a topic can lead to success regardless of the institution's reputation. The conversation highlights the balance between choosing a university based on its academic standing and selecting a research area that genuinely excites the student.
NoobixCube
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Hey all,
I am just writing to see if anyone has any thoughts on well repsected German universities that have a lot of international students attending them.

Any thoughts, just post them up.

I am looking at doing a PhD in a Science related field
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there,

Go for Munich. I don't know anything about their university, but they have something wonderful, called the Hofbräuhaus. If I would have to restart my studies, this is one of the place I would definitely consider. Yeah!

To be a bit more serious, I believe you need to look at what field interest you, and then the choice can be quite simple. I am a firm believer that with passion for a subject, you don't need a "good" university, because you will learn it with passion. This is what makes a good scientist stand out from the bunch, and not the school attended.

Cheers
 
fatra2 said:
I am a firm believer that with passion for a subject, you don't need a "good" university, because you will learn it with passion. This is what makes a good scientist stand out from the bunch, and not the school attended.

The sole aim of a choice of University is not to learn the material. That, you can even do on your own (with a bit of help from PF :wink: ). The aim of the choice of a good university (especially for research work) is that you will work on a hot topic, with "names" in the field, and that you will end up with interesting letters of recommendation. The choice of university is a social network step (besides being a way to learn as well as possible, the relevant material).
(unfortunately, many learn that only later - like me...)

That doesn't mean that going to a non-hot-shot university (of the moment) in the field kills irreversibly your career, but it will have an influence. You might be just as bright as the guy or girl that has been the student of Professor WellKnownGuy, you will have more difficulties getting in somewhere than with his letter (or his phone call, or his adress book). You can still make your way, but it will be harder, slower, and riskier.
 
vanesch said:
The aim of the choice of a good university (especially for research work) is that you will work on a hot topic, with "names" in the field, and that you will end up with interesting letters of recommendation.

I agree completely with you. But what good is it to have a "hot" subject that you can't smell from a distance. Aren't you better to choose a subject where you are passionate, eventhough not the "hottest" subject around. This way, you might not have to have a recommendation letter to say how good you are, because you will be able to prove it from the knowledge you gain.

Cheers
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top